• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jack Hobbs vs Viv Richards

Who is the greater test batsman?


  • Total voters
    30

Johan

International Captain
60+ I can see, 65+ probably an exaggeration, Smith/Tendulkar (pre Decline)/Kallis all got close enough for me to see Hobbs doing it with how kind age was to him
 

Thala_0710

State Vice-Captain
Smith averages 56.

Averaging over 60 for a long career in the modern age has proven to be a bit of a barrier. Someone doing north of 65 in this era would be an outlier, a minor one compared to Bradman but still would be like a bowler taking 400 wickets averaging 18.
Tendulkar averaging close to 60 for the period of 1993-2011 is probably the closest thing to this, although it's still not a "statistical outlier". More so, a freakish display of prolonged greatness.
 

Johan

International Captain
simply put, I got Hammond in my top 10 batters of all time, a 45+ Hobbs after surgeries and multiple injuries and a world war was a better player of fast bowling. averaging 100+ against the West Indies who had a great attack and having 3 tons against them (including one 200) while Hammond wasn't able to combat them and especially Constantine. almost made runs against Larwood/Voce when he was playing internationals at 45.

like, I can genuinely not fathom anyone bar Don doing that.
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
simply put, I got Hammond in my top 10 batters of all time, a 45+ Hobbs after surgeries and multiple injuries and a world war was a better player of fast bowling. averaging 100+ against the West Indies who had a great attack and having 3 tons against them (including one 200) while Hammond wasn't able to combat them and especially Constantine. almost made runs against Larwood/Voce when he was playing internationals at 45.

like, I can genuinely not fathom anyone bar Don doing that.
Are you talking first class?
 

Johan

International Captain
Are you talking first class?
Yeah as the West Indians (Griffith/Constantine/Francis/Martindale etc) played Surrey sometimes too, Hobbs did make a ton against them in Internationals too.

Obviously, Larwood and Voce would have to be FC.
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah as the West Indians (Griffith/Constantine/Francis/Martindale etc) played Surrey sometimes too, Hobbs did make a ton against them in Internationals too.

Obviously, Larwood and Voce would have to be FC.
Assuming you were just to judge him by his test career, would you put him no.2?
 

Johan

International Captain
Could you provide the stats of Hobbs against pacers in that age?
530 @ 106 in 7 innings with 3 tons against the West Indians, he'd be 45+ in his first encounter witn them

against Larwood/Voce/Staple/Barrett he struggled more but easily north of 40 while he was a test cricketer. he'd be 40 in his first encounter with them.
 

sayon basak

International Captain
530 @ 106 in 7 innings with 3 tons against the West Indians, he'd be 45+ in his first encounter witn them

against Larwood/Voce/Staple/Barrett he struggled more but easily north of 40 while he was a test cricketer. he'd be 40 in his first encounter with them.
@Coronis probably posted a bowler by bowler stats a while ago. It'd be great if he posted that again.
 

L Trumper

State Regular
If it is just tests, then this isn't close.

Bradman >> Hobbs >> Everyone else

Prewar Hobbs is bradmanesque in dominance over his peers. Only Bradman and Hobbs had that over the past 125 years.

Postwar he is still arguably the best batter in the world for a decade in his late 30s to mid 40s.
 

govinda indian fan

International 12th Man
If it is just tests, then this isn't close.

Bradman >> Hobbs >> Everyone else

Prewar Hobbs is bradmanesque in dominance over his peers. Only Bradman and Hobbs had that over the past 125 years.

Postwar he is still arguably the best batter in the world for a decade in his late 30s to mid 40s.
How much did hobbs average in his peak
 

sayon basak

International Captain
Here's some info's I found from @peterhrt and @Johan's posts.

Between his fortieth birthday in December 1922 and the end of the 1930 English season, when he last represented England aged 47, Hobbs scored 20,530 first-class runs at an average of 60.02, with 76 centuries. He had 378 innings.

In exactly one third of those innings,126, there was at least one fast bowler in the opposition. Chronological list as follows:

English: Arthur Gilligan (pre-injury while still fast), Gubby Allen, Larwood, Nichols, Voce, Bowes, Nobby Clark
West Indian: George Francis, Constantine, Herman Griffith
Australian: Tim Wall, Gregory, McDonald, John Scott (South Australia)

Between the ages of 40 and 47, Hobbs' record in first-class matches when these 14 bowlers opposed him was 6,552 runs, average 57.98, with 19 centuries.

He scored at least one century against all of them, apart from Bowes and Clark, against whom he only played four innings, passing fifty each time.

Hobbs was dismissed 113 times in these games, but only on 28 occasions by the quicks. Larwood got him seven times and McDonald five. Unlike other English batsmen, he rarely had much trouble with Gregory, either before or after his fortieth birthday.

The West Indian George Francis dismissed him cheaply the first three times they met, but Hobbs followed up with a couple of hundreds and a fifty. Gubby Allen had sixteen attempts to get him out and never succeeded, Hobbs averaging 87 with a highest score of 316*.

Some of Jack's performances against Larwood:-


Against Constantine and Griffith:-

Against Grimmett:-
 

L Trumper

State Regular
Hobbs in his 40s is still the best player of the 1920s, especially against pace bowling. This forum greatly underrates him, because of the era he played in, otherwise there is no one better since except Bradman.

If we bring ODIs into account (which we should since from mid 80s - mid 00s, they were seen as equivalent to tests), then Viv & Tendulkar are close to him. Otherwise no.
 

Top