Tendulkar averaging close to 60 for the period of 1993-2011 is probably the closest thing to this, although it's still not a "statistical outlier". More so, a freakish display of prolonged greatness.Smith averages 56.
Averaging over 60 for a long career in the modern age has proven to be a bit of a barrier. Someone doing north of 65 in this era would be an outlier, a minor one compared to Bradman but still would be like a bowler taking 400 wickets averaging 18.
Yes it gets him to no.2 in my books but still averaged 52 overallTendulkar averaging close to 60 for the period of 1993-2011 is probably the closest thing to this, although it's still not a "statistical outlier". More so, a freakish display of prolonged greatness.
Are you talking first class?simply put, I got Hammond in my top 10 batters of all time, a 45+ Hobbs after surgeries and multiple injuries and a world war was a better player of fast bowling. averaging 100+ against the West Indies who had a great attack and having 3 tons against them (including one 200) while Hammond wasn't able to combat them and especially Constantine. almost made runs against Larwood/Voce when he was playing internationals at 45.
like, I can genuinely not fathom anyone bar Don doing that.
Yeah as the West Indians (Griffith/Constantine/Francis/Martindale etc) played Surrey sometimes too, Hobbs did make a ton against them in Internationals too.Are you talking first class?
Assuming you were just to judge him by his test career, would you put him no.2?Yeah as the West Indians (Griffith/Constantine/Francis/Martindale etc) played Surrey sometimes too, Hobbs did make a ton against them in Internationals too.
Obviously, Larwood and Voce would have to be FC.
right up there but Viv and Sachin get closer now as Hobbs doesn't have the feats of dismantling High pacers while 45+ anymoreAssuming you were just to judge him by his test career, would you put him no.2?
Could you provide the stats of Hobbs against pacers in that age?right up there but Viv and Sachin get closer now as Hobbs doesn't have the feats of dismantling High pacers while 45+ anymore
530 @ 106 in 7 innings with 3 tons against the West Indians, he'd be 45+ in his first encounter witn themCould you provide the stats of Hobbs against pacers in that age?
@Coronis probably posted a bowler by bowler stats a while ago. It'd be great if he posted that again.530 @ 106 in 7 innings with 3 tons against the West Indians, he'd be 45+ in his first encounter witn them
against Larwood/Voce/Staple/Barrett he struggled more but easily north of 40 while he was a test cricketer. he'd be 40 in his first encounter with them.
Nah 53.79Yes it gets him to no.2 in my books but still averaged 52 overall
How much did hobbs average in his peakIf it is just tests, then this isn't close.
Bradman >> Hobbs >> Everyone else
Prewar Hobbs is bradmanesque in dominance over his peers. Only Bradman and Hobbs had that over the past 125 years.
Postwar he is still arguably the best batter in the world for a decade in his late 30s to mid 40s.
In Ashes tests prewar Hobbs averaged around 55, rest were 40 and below.How much did hobbs average in his peak
Here's some info's I found from @peterhrt and @Johan's posts.Not me.