Thala_0710
State Vice-Captain
One of Jardine or Taylor
This is so damn overstated.Imran won overseas in Eng and Ind. Unlike Llyod who got steamrolled 5-1 in Aus, he faced a superior no.1 team in WI home and away and held his own.
Lloyd's black washing is entirely due to resources he had at his disposal not captaincy acumen.
Lloyd united the WI side but Imran had a far more difficult task to unite the Pakistan side.
None of the two of them, nor Richards were great captains.I don't rate Lloyd in the absolute top echelon honestly. Great leader and the 4 man pace attack worked wonders, but his tactics were a bit rigid as far as I got to know.
Unlike you, I give credit to Lloyd for uniting his side. You don't for Imran despite Pakistan being notoriously the most divisive and fractitious side in history.Picking players and bringing a team together isn't an especially difficult skill, if you can't then you're just bad. Imran gets the benefit because he's compared to the horrible captains that came before him, but we're not grading on a scale.
Disagree. Cricket is not just tactics. But I rate Taylor ahead of them.At the end of the day, neither was tactically anywhere near Taylor, and that (and winning) is what really is what separates the great from the good. You have to be great tactically.
Imran united a more difficult team.In what metric or by argument is Imran better than Lloyd.
Neither were great captains, but what the argument for Imran over Lloyd. One took a team that was being pummelled to the greatest of all time.
Who are great captains according to you?Neither were great captains.
Nah. Viv had a peak Marshall, Best years of Garner, Holding averaged 24 in 85-86, peak of Bishop (averaged 20.5 in 89-90), Walsh and Ambrose.Viv had a weaker and aging team without the pace quartet hence not the same dominance.
Viv got a strong team which was built by Lloyd so he had less burden to worry about the strategies as Lloyd had already set themViv couldn't get the reputation but he held similar results though.
anybody could have captained is exaggeration. Yes, even if Taylor (GOAT according to you) would have captained West Indies he wouldn't have the burden of determining the strategies since the West Indies based on their own quality was capable of winning, but does mean Taylor was not a good captain? It is just because he seldom needs any strategies. But who was the one who built those initial strategies... for them to carry forward? that is what makes Lloyd as a captain superior in comparison with Imran. selecting youngsters in West Indies which is divided by different countries is far difficult than in Pakistan...Imran united a more difficult team.
Imran selected and groomed youngsters who became stars.
Imran took a less strong team and made them competitive in a way they had never been, including standing up to tougher opposition. Lloyd had a team by 79/80 anybody could have captained.
No reason really. Mark Taylor was a brilliant strategistThat might be a joke/pity vote.
sorry, not underestimating Taylor...but was just mentioning that because subs told Taylor is the GOAT... yes he is great and is considered GOAT by many... didn't mean that only subs considers him as GOAT. I also consider him as elite.That might be a joke/pity vote.
Agreed. One of the biggest reasons I rate Lloyd significantly higher. But as I said, I also felt Lloyd's tactical strategies were a bit rigid.Viv got a strong team which was built by Lloyd so he had less burden to worry about the strategies as Lloyd had already set them
If Llyod seldom needed those strategies that shows how easy it was to captain a team of all stars.It is just because he seldom needs any strategies.
Anything you give credit to Lloyd here just applies moreso to Imran. If you are suggesting that WI was as fractitious a team as captain historically, I don't think that is true at all.selecting youngsters in West Indies which is divided by different countries is far difficult than in Pakistan...
Also building confidence among a team to become the top of world when their countries had many political problems with the other countries relating to racism.
To become an ATG Captain one must become captain of a weak team and make it strong definitely deserves applauds, but fixing that as a threshold is too much
Lloyd was the one who developed those strategies for the West Indies to carry forward after which after which he himself or any other person captaining has seldom things to worry about.If Llyod seldom needed those strategies that shows how easy it was to captain a team of all stars.
There was a lot of political turmoil in the US and Caribbeans during the 60s. Many of the caribbean nations got independence during the 60s. Martin Luther King was shot dead. Muhammad Ali threw away his gold medal won during the 1960 Olympics as he witnessed racism...Anything you give credit to Lloyd here just applies moreso to Imran. If you are suggesting that WI was as fractitious a team as captain historically, I don't think that is true at all.
The Duke of Wellington of CricketFrom all I've read he was so damn negative and defensive. His first objective was not to lose.
Tbh losing is also the outcome I’d least want to occur for my team.From all I've read he was so damn negative and defensive. His first objective was not to lose.
Dude you are really stretching it, Lloyd didn't conquer institutional racism he just helped build a cricket team.There was a lot of political turmoil in the US and Caribbeans during the 60s. Many of the caribbean nations got independence during the 60s. Martin Luther King was shot dead. Muhammad Ali threw away his gold medal won during the 1960 Olympics as he witnessed racism...
'There were great Cricketers, but they were not winning combinations' - Colin Croft in Fire in Babylon
'Across Caribbean accent is different, food is different, you experience a variety of things across different islands, we all come from different backgrounds and to mold them into a unit is never gonna be easy' - Gordon Greenidge in Fire in Babylon
'You have to have someone who can keep all those people together' - Michael Holding in Fire in Babylon
Only common thing was racism..not even location... Guyana was in South America were as rest were in North America
There were ups an downs in the caribbean cricket until the mid 1970s until a bunch of youngsters with Clive Lloyd came in... They were experiencing racism in the mid 70s when they were asked to tour to England... (not just grovel...but the african immigrants living in England was also facing negative reception from englishmen).... Lloyd built the confidence.... Designed the way the way the West Indians were to play till the end of the next decade.
No. I just meant Lloyd not only build the team but also built the confidence in the team.. By confidence i mean there was lack of confidence due to racism especially while touring to England…Dude you are really stretching it, Lloyd didn't conquer institutional racism he just helped build a cricket team.