• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steve Smith vs Sachin Tendulkar (after 205 innings)

Who is more impressive?

  • Steve Smith

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • Sachin Tendulkar

    Votes: 12 60.0%

  • Total voters
    20

Narayana

U19 Cricketer
Highway player

Wow i love Such pitches, okay
This should end this debate -
Ps- sachin only played once in wi against 90s wi and scored 289 runs,
And sl is stong in current era, as Australia is struggling to win in sl since 10+ years.

And i should respect him as he is one of the greatest ever .

Screenshot_2025-02-01-01-38-30-33.jpgScreenshot_2025-02-01-01-39-04-70.jpg
 

Coronis

International Coach

kyear2

International Coach
1908-1924 : Jack Hobbs
1925-1929: Herbert Sutcliffe
1930-1948: Sir Don Bradman
1949-1955: Sir Len Hutton
1956-1957: Peter May
1958-1974: Gary Sobers
1975-1989: Viv Richards
1990-1993: Graham Gooch
1994-1995: Brian Lara
1996-2001: Sachin Tendulkar
2002-2006: Brian Lara
2007-2011: Sachin Tendulkar
2012-2013: Hashim Amla
2014-2019: Steve Smith
2020-2025: Joe Root

1912-28: Hobbs
1928-30: Hammond
1930-49: Bradman
1949-55: Hutton
1955-60: May
1960-70: Sobers
1970-76: Barry Richards
1976-90: Viv Richards
1990-94: Gooch
1994-95: Lara

That's Simon Wilde's take, for the years subsequent, I'm not sure if Amla needs to squeezed in there. Also not sure from all I've read on Sutcliffe that he was really seen as the best during those years.
 

MasterBlaster24

School Boy/Girl Captain
1912-28: Hobbs
1928-30: Hammond
1930-49: Bradman
1949-55: Hutton
1955-60: May
1960-70: Sobers
1970-76: Barry Richards
1976-90: Viv Richards
1990-94: Gooch
1994-95: Lara

That's Simon Wilde's take, for the years subsequent, I'm not sure if Amla needs to squeezed in there. Also not sure from all I've read on Sutcliffe that he was really seen as the best during those years.
1986-90 should be Crowe, imo.
 

kyear2

International Coach
That's includes his ace tour in Aus in 2007. Of course he was helped by pitches but for a post peak period this was genuinely productive.

Anyways it shouldnt be looked at this way.

It was 2003 to 2006/7 decline with injuries. 2007/8 to 2011 new peak that was ATG. Then 2011 to 2013 end career dip.
This is what I don't get about you.

When it's Sachin it's a 2nd peak, when it's Lara it's post 2000's bashing. Same for Kallis, he was just flat track bashing.
Why does almost every single batters entered their peaks during the 2007-2011 period?

Is it because they were as good as Sachin or.....?
Not the worst argument you've made.
 

govinda indian fan

International 12th Man
This is what I don't get about you.

When it's Sachin it's a 2nd peak, when it's Lara it's post 2000's bashing. Same for Kallis, he was just flat track bashing.

Not the worst argument you've made.
Nobody calls lara's post 2000 batting bashing. He averaged 50 in 90s and thats enough to say his atg.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Viv 1976-1981 ~ Sachin 93-2002

Viv 82-88 ~ Sachin 2002-2011

Viv 89-91 ~ Sachin 2012-2013

for me
Agree.

Prime Viv's runs are more quality (I count WSC) but Sachin's volume is more, go with whatever you want.
No arguments here either.

And I'll never understand the argument not to count WSC, that's where the best players were and the absolute toughest test for batsmen.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Not even close


Viv(82-88) : 57 Tests. 3591 runs @ 46.9. 10 centuries
SRT(02-11) : 96 Tests. 7869 runs @ 54.27. 24 centuries.
Exc Zim/Ban : 90 Tests. 7067 runs @ 50.47. 19 tons.
How is it not close?

This is where context comes in.

One was a flat pitch era where everyone was cashing in, the other was the heart of the 80's with multiple ATG bowlers and no free lunches.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
This is what I don't get about you.

When it's Sachin it's a 2nd peak, when it's Lara it's post 2000's bashing. Same for Kallis, he was just flat track bashing.

Not the worst argument you've made.
When did I dismiss 2001 to 2006 for Lara entirely as post 2000s bashing? I just said at home pitches were flatter, which I also said directly to you about Tendulkar. I called it Lara's second peak many many times.

Stop being bitter.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
How is it not close?

This is where context comes in.

One was a flat pitch era where everyone was cashing in, the other was the heart of the 80's with multiple ATG bowlers and no free lunches.
Tendulkar was better by virtue of having another peak from 2007/8 to early 2011 where he rose in rankings to become no.1 in the world again. Viv by mid 80s was no.1 in name not really runs or rankings. Yes even with flat pitches Tendulkar still averaged 60 odd then.


And Tendulkars decline 2003 to 2006/7 was mostly injuries.
 
Last edited:

capt_Luffy

International Coach
Tendulkar was better by virtue of having another peak from 2007/8 to early 2011 where he rose in rankings to become no.1 in the world again. Viv by mid 80s was no.1 in name not really runs or rankings. Yes even with flat pitches Tendulkar still averaged 60 odd then.

And Tendulkars decline 2003 to 2006/7 was mostly injuries, not just losing his mojo like Viv.
Viv did had some eyes issues iirc
 

Top