• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***official*** England whiteball tour of india January 2025***

Spark

Global Moderator
Probably what will end up happening is that the 12th man is the dedicated sub, and it doesn't matter who gets subbed out, it's always the same guy subbed in.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
At that time , opinion on CW was Chahal was a bowler and Jadeja an all rounder. So not like for like replacement. Imo Teams should declare this before the match to avoid confusion in the future.
The rule itself states clearly that like for like is not the only criterion. The role the player was expected to play in the rest of the game, is the criteria.
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah but that one makes sense coz Jaddu would have definitely bowled at least 3 overs when Australia batted. Which is what the rule says should be taken into consideration.
Jadeja took 6 wickets @ 53 in the ipl before that tour and went at nearly 9 an over. Chatal took 21 wickets @19 and went at 7 an over. Its obviously not as bad as harshit for dube, but getting peak t20 batting jadeja to bat for you than having chahal cover his overs is absolutely gross.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Jadeja took 6 wickets @ 53 in the ipl before that tour and went at nearly 9 an over. Chatal took 21 wickets @19 and went at 7 an over. Its obviously not as bad as harshit for dube, but getting peak t20 batting jadeja to bat for you than having chahal cover his overs is absolutely gross.
But he was the only other spinner in the squad. That was the point which swayed David Boon, I think. Here this was not the case as Ramandeep was there.
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
The rule itself states clearly that like for like is not the only criterion. The role the player was expected to play in the rest of the game, is the criteria.

We finally agree. Dube was never going to bowl here, it was a joke to even put Harshit’s name forward.
 

Top