Okay, do the same for Sachin as well.let's remove Smith's high way knocks
Two things can be true at once. Sachin was genuinely great at that time (in fact he achieved no.1) and it was a batting friendly era where others also scored.Why does almost every single batters entered their peaks during the 2007-2011 period?
Is it because they were as good as Sachin or.....?
Not even closeAgree except lengths
Why do you say when you posted that he averaged 40 plus?Immense worshipping for 27. 7 AVG across 5 years.
00 era wi also didn't have a single bowler with<30 bowling average.Not even close
Viv(82-88) : 57 Tests. 3591 runs @ 46.9. 10 centuries
SRT(02-11) : 96 Tests. 7869 runs @ 54.27. 24 centuries.
Exc Zim/Ban : 90 Tests. 7067 runs @ 50.47. 19 tons.
pitches are so flat that Viv probably wins on the number alone, but I meant 2003-2011, post the numbers of Sachin against top sides in that timeframeNot even close
Viv(82-88) : 57 Tests. 3591 runs @ 46.9. 10 centuries
SRT(02-11) : 96 Tests. 7869 runs @ 54.27. 24 centuries.
Exc Zim/Ban : 90 Tests. 7067 runs @ 50.47. 19 tons.
Highway tracks are destroying test cricket, same for highway knocks.Why do you say when you posted that he averaged 40 plus?
Kimber's video had match factor comparisons throughout. In low avging games Sachin had a better match factor to Smith, despite probably having a slightly better batting line up and worse bowlers in his team. However, on batting friendly wkts Smith's match factor was much higher@BazBall21 do you have Smith and Sachin's numbers in sub average RPW games?
so it's the exact opposite of the narrative Narayana tries to push of Sachin being a flat track bullyKimber's video had match factor comparisons throughout. In low avging games Sachin had a better match factor to Smith, despite probably having a slightly better batting line up and worse bowlers in his team. However, on batting friendly wkts Smith's match factor was much higher
Yesso it's the exact opposite of the narrative Narayana tries to push of Sachin being a flat track bully
Kohli 2014-19 ~ sachin' 1989-2002
Kohli's 2020-25 > sachin' 2022 dec - 2007.
Till now Kohli is better, Just one peak is needed to destroy the legacy of Sachin.
Between after 205 innings sachin Tendulkar's AVG is 47. 93 without those 3 highway death of test cricket knocks ,
Just little bit difference ,
Don't be blind man majority of late 90s pitches were flat,
No way, Kohli also played on a bunch of flat wickets from 2014 to 2017, such as the 2014 BGT and the 2016 English series, and he heavily thrashed a minnow Lankan team. When it comes to test cricket, there is no comparison between Sachin and Kohli. Sachin is far superior to Kohli. Furthermore, Sachin was successful against a lot more ATG bowlers in the 1990s.
He also said this is because Steve Smith so many games compared to sachin in bowling friendly pitches.so it's the exact opposite of the narrative Narayana tries to push of Sachin being a flat track bully
He also said this is because Steve Smith playing so many games compared to sachin in bowling friendly pitches.Kimber's video had match factor comparisons throughout. In low avging games Sachin had a better match factor to Smith, despite probably having a slightly better batting line up and worse bowlers in his team. However, on batting friendly wkts Smith's match factor was much higher
So 90s era india had strong batting line ups according to you.Kimber's video had match factor comparisons throughout. In low avging games Sachin had a better match factor to Smith, despite probably having a slightly better batting line up and worse bowlers in his team. However, on batting friendly wkts Smith's match factor was much higher
You can't avoid their top scoring knocks for one and not the other. Especially if any helped lead to a victory.Highway tracks are destroying test cricket, same for highway knocks.
So for the sake of test cricket life, we should avoid the highway knocks,
Kohli is still getting immense hate for the ahmedabad knock.
1995-1999: 200 tests - Runs per wickets 30.98majority of late 90s pitches were flat,