• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is the best since Bradman?

Who is Best since Bradman

  • Steve Smith

    Votes: 8 25.8%
  • Sachin Tendulkar

    Votes: 23 74.2%

  • Total voters
    31

Johan

International Captain
Hobbs was averaging 57 when the second best batter of his generation (Trumper) was averaging 39, He's another breed.
 

Johan

International Captain
my top 15 ignoring active players

1. Donald Bradman

2. Jack Hobbs
3. Sachin Tendulkar/Viv Richards
4. Sachin Tendulkar/Viv Richards
5. Garfield Sobers
6. Len Hutton
7. Brian Lara
8. Wally Hammond
9. George Headley
10. Sunil Gavaskar
11. Herbert Sutcliffe
12. Greg Chappel
13. Ricky Ponting/Jack Kallis
14. Ricky Ponting/Jack Kallis
15. Graeme Pollock
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
my top 15 ignoring active players

1. Donald Bradman

2. Jack Hobbs
3. Sachin Tendulkar/Viv Richards
4. Sachin Tendulkar/Viv Richards
5. Garfield Sobers
6. Len Hutton
7. Brian Lara
8. Wally Hammond
9. George Headley
10. Sunil Gavaskar
11. Herbert Sutcliffe
12. Greg Chappel
13. Ricky Ponting/Jack Kallis
14. Ricky Ponting/Jack Kallis
15. Graeme Pollock
Gavaskar way too low, especially behind Hammond and Headley
 

Johan

International Captain
Trumper was of the previous generation really. It's like saying Sachin and Smith were of the same Gen
alright, Hobbs was averaging 57 while some of the best batters in the world were averaging 40 while having more favourable home conditions
 

Johan

International Captain
Yeah, me too. But I find both him and Hammond tough to place in the BAB tier as they never really faced any Great pacers in Tests arena. A lot of good ones, but not a single with a Great Test career.
if they were both a couple years younger we'd have got to see them vs Lindwall and Miller, sigh
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Was just about to post this. Kimber makes the case what we am have been saying. You cant get past Tendulkar's longevity.

But perhaps Smith has a case over some others like Lara, Hutton etc.
It's not a good analysis. Shouldn't be using a metric like match factor when one has a far far better bowling attack - which helps significantly reduce the match averages and in turn considerably boost the match factor. It's only a valid metric if two players have a similar strength bowling attack and similar strength batting unit. You'll be hard pressed to find such cases. So it's a crap metric.
 

Johan

International Captain
One played 80 more tests & 7.5 more years than the other. It's too big a differential to overcome imo unless the other avgs like 4-5 points more.
think Tendulkar vs Viv is just another case of longetivity vs Peak, Sobers is an interesting discussion, I generally rate both below either but his record is actually superior to either
 

Johan

International Captain
This is the only Cricketting community that I've ever come to see on Internet that actively belittles Viv Richards, you hate to see it.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
This is the only Cricketting community that I've ever come to see on Internet that actively belittles Viv Richards, you hate to see it.
No one belittles him lol. Some just think he wasn't definitively better than Lara or Gavaskar or Chappell or Barrington.....
 

Top