• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jasprit Bumrah vs Waqar Younis

Who is the better test bowler?(ignore longevity)


  • Total voters
    45

Rob Wesley

School Boy/Girl Captain
Waqar was a bit of weak team basher. But otherwise, he did really well vs Windies. He was unlucky to not play SA at his prime. He faced them from 1997 onwards. His record would have been better.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
Really? He wasn't that great against good teams even in his prime.
Not really. Had one alright tour of Australia, but dominated a Great WI line-up. He did played relatively quite weaker teams much more often than say Bumrah though in his prime, for the better or worse.
 

Randomfan

School Boy/Girl Captain
There were 7 non-minnow teams during Waqar's prime.

Waqar versus peers when Waqar was at his mythical peak in tests involving top 6 teams:

1737827830635.png


Waqar after his mythical peak against non-minnows: 40-50 tests with 1 5-fers.

WaqarAfter94.jpg



Why will anyone even cite longevity with 1 5-fers with 40-50 tests. That lonegevity is useless. I can't even come up with 2nd example of a bowler playing 40-50 tests with only 1-fer.

Even before 1995, he was never at Bumrah's level. Lots of pacers outperformed Waqar against good teams even during his peak.

In my opinion, Bumrah was above Waqar even before Aus series. Gap has become just too wide now. It's a lopsided comparison.
 
Last edited:

Randomfan

School Boy/Girl Captain
Not really. Had one alright tour of Australia, but dominated a Great WI line-up. He did played relatively quite weaker teams much more often than say Bumrah though in his prime, for the better or worse.
But there is no equivalence of Waqar's performance and Bumrah's performance against top teams any time in their career, including Waqar's prime.

Here is matches involving top 6 teams during prime - Waqar played 18 games


1737829369261.png



Lots of pacers outperformed Waqar in tests invovling top 6 sides during his peak. Only against 1 team he averages under 25.

No one has outperformed Bumrah in tests involving top 6 sides since he debuted. Against all teams, except one, he averages below 25.

That is including home and away both. Just for away, it's even more lopsided comaprison. And yes, I am talking about Waqar's prime and if you go out side of prime then Waqar played 40-50 tests with 1-fers against non-minnows. That's not even world class. I am struggling to cite any world class bowler playing 40-50 tests with 1 5-fer.

There is no evidence to suggest that Waqar was in Bumrah's class any time in his career and then Waqar's last 43 tests pulls him far far down.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
But there is no equivalence of Waqar's performance and Bumrah's performance against top teams any time in their career, including Waqar's prime.

Here is matches involving top 6 teams during prime - Waqar played 18 games


View attachment 44857



Lots of pacers outperformed Waqar in tests involing top 6 sides during his peak. Only against 1 team he averages under 25.

No one has outperformed Bumrah in tests involving top 6 sides. Against all teams, except one, he averages below 25.

That is including home and away both. Just for away, it's even more lopsided comaprison. And yes, I am talking about Waqar's prime and if you go out side of prime then Waqar played 40-50 tests with 1-fers against non-minnows. That's not even world class. I am striuggling to cite any world class bowler playing 40-50 tests with 1 5-fer.

There is no evidence to suggest that Waqar was in Bumrah's class any time in his career.
Can't count 89 and his early 90 Aussie tour in his prime imo. He burst into scene, but not from his debut game.
 

Randomfan

School Boy/Girl Captain
Can't count 89 and his early 90 Aussie tour in his prime imo. He burst into scene, but not from his debut game.
OK, we can remove 89 and early 90s Aussies tour, Then he has these 13 tests, Only against one team he averaged sub 25 among top 6 test teams during his prime.

We already know that he wasn't even world class for the last 43 tests so longevity arguement is just meaningless. And his peak is not worth hyping.

1737830821745.png

No one hypes, Bumrah averaging 10 agasint SL/WI/BD. He is rated for turning it on and actually having a great record against top teams of his era, Waqar never had it even in his prime.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
OK, we can remove 89 and early 90s Aussies tour, Then he has these 13 tests, Only against one team he averaged sub 25 among top 6 test teams during his prime.

We already know that he wasn't even world class for the last 43 tests so longevity arguement is just meaningless. And his peak is not worth hyping.

View attachment 44858

No one hypes, Bumrah averaging 10 agasint SL/WI/BD.
He is rated for turning it on and actually having a great record against top teams of his era, Waqar never had it even in his prime.
Probably should though. I have said this before and will again, 2019 is still some of the best pure bowling class I have ever watched. You always can't select whom you play. Waqar had a crazy good 5 year peak where despite bashing a weak NZ (though mind you, with Crowe, who was better than anyone from England). Absolutely dominated a still very strong WI line-up and had a very good tour of England. Played 2 home games vs Australia, though again, it's debatable whether it should count as his prime.
 

Randomfan

School Boy/Girl Captain
Probably should though. I have said this before and will again, 2019 is still some of the best pure bowling class I have ever watched. You always can't select whom you play. Waqar had a crazy good 5 year peak where despite bashing a weak NZ (though mind you, with Crowe, who was better than anyone from England). Absolutely dominated a still very strong WI line-up and had a very good tour of England. Played 2 home games vs Australia, though again, it's debatable whether it should count as his prime.
I am not saying that Waqar was not good during his prime. Waqar was good during his prime and yet many outperformed him against better teams.

Given that and him being not even world class for 43 tests after injury, comparison is lopsided here.
 

Rob Wesley

School Boy/Girl Captain
Really? He wasn't that great against good teams even in his prime.
We can’t assume anything based on 13 games sample. Include NZ and then compare with his peers because NZ with Crowe is more or less at same level as Eng or India. They would do well vs some teams and not do well vs some.

He was destructive vs NZ and WI at its prime. He was good vs Aus and Eng. He didn’t played SA and India at its prime.

He averages 28 vs SA and he played the SA team from 1997 onwards. He wasn’t at his prime but SA had Donald, Pollock at its prime destroying teams. In batting, SA now had Kallis too. That tells me that if Waqar got to face SA of pre-1995, he would have done a lot better.
 

Rob Wesley

School Boy/Girl Captain
Waqar in 1990 vs NZ :-

3 matches 29 wickets

This was the series where Crowe was lone warrior for NZ. Question could be raised how did Waqar actually managed to pick so many wickets in this series on home pitches?
 

Top