• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Richard Hadlee vs Gary Sobers

Hadlee(bowling) vs Sobers(batting)


  • Total voters
    20

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
Oh oh... This is tough

Excluding Don and Barnes

1.Gavaskar
2.Sobers

1.Akram
2.Hadlee

People think Sobers underachieved with bat.
But Hadlee was One man army.
Now, we have to use Stardom and Style..
Sobers wins.. Just
 

kyear2

International Coach
I read somewhere that he had like 5 surgeries before his 1957 England series and was not in the condition to play but played anyway, averaged 17 that series, but when he was healthy (or minor problems) he averaged 56 in 1950 in England and made 256 in one inning against Sir Alec Bedser and Jim Laker, some of the greatest bowlers England ever had
Yeah Weekes had destroyed some thigh muscles in an injury and it also greatly compromised his next Australia tour.

But the record is the record, and away in the 50's was a gauntlet and some thing the players of the previous 3 decades never had to deal with.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I would say Hutton, Sunny & Lara are in the same tier as well but many would not agree.
Noting how some are slowly trying to slip Sunny in there.

But I have Smith, Lara, Hutton in the same sub tier. Possibly a touch below best after Bradman (Tendulkar, Richards, Sobers, Hobbs), but still best in their era (co for Lara).
 

kyear2

International Coach
Hadlee for me. On primary skill, I'm only willing to rate maybe Marshall, McGrath and Sachin above, again maybe. Bradman obviously is incomparable.
For the most part I like this.

On primary skills alone, the only ones definitely ahead of Hadlee for me are...

Marshall, Tendulkar, McGrath, Richards, Hobbs.

I think I rate Hadlee and Sobers just about equal and hard to separate.

And I've consistently said that it's Hadlee and not the other 80's all rounder who
is Sobers's natural comp. Primary, all rounder and cricketer. Though more so the former and latter.

Brilliant bowler who just happened to play in an era with the GOAT bowler and overshadowed by the GOAT bowling all rounder as well. That's just ****ed up timing, but in both cases he's still 2nd best.
 

Top