• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Brian Lara vs Ricky Ponting (against pace bowling)

better player of fast bowling?


  • Total voters
    28

pardus

U19 12th Man
@Van_Sri
Usually the fundamental criteria in putting an innings in the greatest list is that - it shouldn't be in a losing cause.
So changing the result will change everything.
Just quality-wise, I am not a big fan of the 153*, I felt Lara gave too many chances.
But in context of the pressure on Lara, and the quality of the opposition, and the sheer drama of a 4th innings chase (last 60 runs scored with the last 2 batsmen - Ambrose & Walsh), it is understandably rated very high by everyone who followed it live at the time.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
When was Lara out? Oh you mean the 1st test when yet again, Healey didn't have the ball in hand yet ran him out?
Was a close lbw off macgill. I'll try and look up the video.

Anyway I was trolling a bit, Lara's 153 is definitely in the top 5 or so innings ever imo with a strong argument for 1.
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
The greatest batting performance ever is done by a player who would not even be Top 20 in his own team.

The greatest bowling performance is done by a player who would probably not even be in Top 50 among ATG bowlers.
 

Van_Sri

U19 12th Man
@Van_Sri
Usually the fundamental criteria in putting an innings in the greatest list is that - it shouldn't be in a losing cause.
So changing the result will change everything.
Just quality-wise, I am not a big fan of the 153*, I felt Lara gave too many chances.
But in context of the pressure on Lara, and the quality of the opposition, and the sheer drama of a 4th innings chase (last 60 runs scored with the last 2 batsmen - Ambrose & Walsh), it is understandably rated very high by everyone who followed it live at the time.
Tendulkar was in more pressure as the match was against the Arch Rival Pakistan in 1999. As we know the tensions between 2 Countries was rising. Saqlain Mushtaq was in Super Form and of course you have Wasim and Waqar.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
I don’t think Kohli fans think Kohli is better than Tendulkar in Test . In ODIs that is another case.
I don't know if he is a troll or not (suspect he is), but if he isn't then he infact thinks something along those lines. Have said a few times Smith in decline is comparable to peak Tendulkar.
 

Top