Question on ban announcements

[Coronis]

@PaulLennon is no longer b&, yet curiously has not reappeared on cricketweb.net/forums. This is a mystery to me, though it's a ton better without the ****wit.

I blame Yoko.

 

[capt_Luffy]

That Humayun boy got off light but okay. Sad we have no idea whose multi is Monimul_travishead.......

 

[Spark]

Yes obvious VPN or proxy use will get you an immediate ticket to Coventry whereas we still have to go through a little bit of a progress to get rid of "90% chance that it's just a troll".

 

[capt_Luffy]

Yes obvious VPN or proxy use will get you an immediate ticket to Coventry whereas we still have to go through a little bit of a progress to get rid of "90% chance that it's just a troll".

Okay, if for some reason I can't access CW from an Indian server and use VPN, will I get perma'd??

 

[Spark]

Okay, if for some reason I can't access CW from an Indian server and use VPN, will I get perma'd??

Oh yeah that's fine. The VPN/proxy thing is entirely about multis.

 

[sledger]

Pretty much all of my web browsing is done via a VPN these days tbh.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Pretty much all of my web browsing is done via a VPN these days tbh.

Shocker.

 

[Prince EWS]

Okay, if for some reason I can't access CW from an Indian server and use VPN, will I get perma'd??

Nah. If there's a new account that seems suspicious it'll be used as evidence to back up suspicions it's actually a multi, but if we know you're a standing member of the site then it's all good.

 

[sledger]

Shocker.

It just makes sense tbh.

And honestly, anyone who uses public wifi networks (e.g., in train stations, airports, or shopping centres etc.) without a VPN is courting serious trouble.

 

[BoyBrumby]

It just makes sense tbh.

And honestly, anyone who uses public wifi networks (e.g., in train stations, airports, or shopping centres etc.) without a VPN is courting serious trouble.

That's a more reasoned argument than my tossed off smart aleckism deserved, tbh.

You've changed, man. You used to be cool.

 

[sledger]

That's a more reasoned argument than my tossed off smart aleckism deserved, tbh.

You've changed, man. You used to be cool.

Haha no I didn't.

But yes, VPN has other more... household-based advantages as well, shall we say. Remember kids, "incognito mode" on your browser only hides what you look at from other users of your computer, not your ISP

 

[Smudge]

Okay, if for some reason I can't access CW from an Indian server and use VPN, will I get perma'd??

Here's hoping.


P.S. love you.

 

[NZTailender]

Haha no I didn't.

But yes, VPN has other more... household-based advantages as well, shall we say. Remember kids, "incognito mode" on your browser only hides what you look at from other users of your computer, not your ISP

On an unrelated note, which VPN do you use

 

[sledger]

On an unrelated note, which VPN do you use

Surfshark

 

[weeman27bob]

Haha no I didn't.

But yes, VPN has other more... household-based advantages as well, shall we say. Remember kids, "incognito mode" on your browser only hides what you look at from other users of your computer, not your ISP

What if part of the appeal is my ISP knowing exactly what I'm looking at

 

[trundler]

Okay, if for some reason I can't access CW from an Indian server and use VPN, will I get perma'd??

You have CW open in another tab while watching p0rn don't you

 

[nightprowler10]

What if part of the appeal is my ISP knowing exactly what I'm looking at

This one's for you, comcast

 

[andruid]

You have CW open in another tab while watching p0rn don't you

'tis the other way around surely

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

'tis the other way around surely

A man of culture

 

[capt_Luffy]

Was Cricketfan90s even banned?? Didn't found a mention in the Ban Announcement Thread