This isn't a good measure to decide a cricketer rating. Wasim features more than McGrath by this standard, is he a better bowler?One is a lock for an AT team, the other is often on the outside looking in.
Wasim isn't the ones he competing with.This isn't a good measure to decide a cricketer rating. Wasim features more than McGrath by this standard, is he a better bowler?
Strange I wasn't the first person to bring it up, but rhe one you responded to......This isn't a good measure to decide a cricketer rating. Wasim features more than McGrath by this standard, is he a better bowler?
Yes interesting how you don't respond to the argument.Strange I wasn't the first person to bring it up, but rhe one you responded to......
Interesting.
Hadlee isn't the one he's competing with.Yes interesting how you don't respond to the argument.
Is Wasim better than Hadlee for making it into your ATG XI?
NoWasim features more than McGrath by this standard, is he a better bowler?
That wasn't your standard. Your standard to devalue Imran was saying he looks at the ATG XI from the outside.Hadlee isn't the one he's competing with.
Tendulkar. An elite top tier batsman, Imran not in the top tier as a bowler.That wasn't your standard. Your standard to devalue Imran was saying he looks at the ATG XI from the outside.
Aside from being untrue, that also applies to Hadlee. Not Wasim though.
You didn't address the argument. You are just repeating yourself.Tendulkar also a lock for any AT team, including mine, while Imran more often than not, is left looking in from the outside.
If you are taking bastmen as a group, you should take bowlers as a group and not subset of bowlers.Post war
Sachin : Top 1-3 batsman
Imran : Top 6-8 fast bowler