Lol the Indian curators were literally putting sawdust to dry the pitches in that series. They were scared because Imran had blown them away the last two series.
Yes that has been my argument since the beginning. A more proven performer.
It's sincerely not even particularly close.
A test average of 28 in Australia is below par.
Wasim edged out Lillee recently. I recall Lillee being well ahead before.
Do you believe in including WSC or not? Yes or no?
Funny, becuse if those were his overall stats he wouldn't even be in this conversation.
In case you didn't notice, they are trying to shift the topic after being unable to answer Ambrose's small sample issue.
In World Series Cricket Imran had the Best Average among the bowlers who took 25 or more wickets
Yeah because Walsh is proven in more places than Ambrose (using the same logic) but Ambrose is better.
67 is a tad high though isn't it, 28 isn't that great either.
And you haven't addressed Imrans less than elite away issue, even excluding places he did worst.
I'm not sure why you want to discuss raw stats except in the case of Imran. To me it's a low grade dull argument. If you don't want to look at particular context, then that means you already made up your mind and then build arguments later.
Yes.
It's actually worse than what Ambrose did in Pakistan where Ambrose was "middling."
Do you include WSC or not?