WhatCould also make a case for Konstas given how he turned the series at the MCG.
so whether or not bumrah is motm ought to be determined by what happens in an innings bumrah doesn’t actually playSure, if it's 2-2.. not if its 3-1.
I mean, looking at Smith’s stats at home in his peak period he was averaging 96.44. Other Aussie bats (1-6) in Australia were averaging 48.96 and overseas bats (1-6) were averaging 36.03. Insane however flat it may have been.The bowler friendly era started towards the end of Smith's peak. 2017 India tour, 2019 Ashes were very bowler friendly but apart from that, it was a pretty road-y era before 2017 or so.
Yeah they usually don't give player of the series to a losing player of a side of a 3-1 defeat.so whether or not bumrah is motm ought to be determined by what happens in an innings bumrah doesn’t actually play
Yeah I watched those games. Flat wicket era. Roads.I mean, looking at Smith’s stats at home in his peak period he was averaging 96.44. Other Aussie bats (1-6) in Australia were averaging 48.96 and overseas bats (1-6) were averaging 36.03. Insane however flat it may have been.
Man of the Series should be determined by the crucial innings that determine the outcome of the series, no?so whether or not bumrah is motm ought to be determined by what happens in an innings bumrah doesn’t actually play
Bullshit. He’s stood out like dogs balls.Sure, if it's 2-2.. not if its 3-1.
It's ****ing garbageSums up Halba's posting changing every over. These posts were literally one minute apart
It’s bananas.What's the point of picking all rounders if you're not giving them a bowl