• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Andy Flower vs Alan Knott

Who is the better test cricketer?


  • Total voters
    16

DrWolverine

U19 Cricketer
Everyone who saw Flower doesn't rate him much, Gilly just gives you more, he averages 47 to Flower's 51,
Flower averages 53.7 as a wicket keeper.



strikes at Sehwag esque speeds, it's really a no brainer.
That’s partly because he played for the most successful team in cricket history with Top 3 fast bowler, Top 2 spinner, Top 10 opener, Top 15 batsman and the fastest bowler among others.

I rate Flower much higher because he played in a very weak team where he was the only world class cricketer and the next best batsman averaged half of him.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Flower averages 53.7 as a wicket keeper.





That’s partly because he played for the most successful team in cricket history with Top 3 fast bowler, Top 2 spinner, Top 10 opener, Top 15 batsman and the fastest bowler among others.

I rate Flower much higher because he played in a very weak team where he was the only world class cricketer and the next best batsman averaged half of him.
What does any of that have to do with his wicket-keeping skill?
 

DrWolverine

U19 Cricketer
Andy’s wicket keeping skills are good

Andy able to average 53 as a wk despite having many disadvantages is a testament to his batting ability
 

kyear2

International Coach
Andy’s wicket keeping skills are good

Andy able to average 53 as a wk despite having many disadvantages is a testament to his batting ability
Why has he never made an All Time XI, never mentioned as a contender for one. Never mentioned in discussions for greatest keeper batsmen.

The issue that I have with this, as I've said before, is the notion that we're discovering something that somehow everyone else has missed.

For the record I don't think Boucher was that special either, so that's my general perception of ratings.
 

DrWolverine

U19 Cricketer
I was listening to Jarrod Kimber who said Flower was a better keeper than Gilly. Is that true? I have no recollection.
I am fairly certain none of us here throughly analysed Flower or Gilly for their keeping. As far as I remember, both were were not bad keepers. That’s about it. We watched Adam Gilchrist for his destructive ability and Andy Flower for keeping the hopes of his team alive.
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
People are allowed to think Flower was a good keeper if they want but I find it funny how people assume there's no one here who actually remembers how good/bad his keeping was. I , @Prince EWS and a few others remember his keeping not being great and have said so.

You can disagree if you want but I find it extremely obnoxious when you ***** go "I dont remember anything about his keeping, therefore it was good because if it was bad I'd have remembered it and people who think his keeping was bad don't remember his keeping either". Like, what the **** kind of brain breaking logic is that lmao. Maybe just accept people have different opinions of his keeping ffs.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

International Coach
I am fairly certain none of us here throughly analysed Flower or Gilly for their keeping. As far as I remember, both were were not bad keepers. That’s about it. We watched Adam Gilchrist for his destructive ability and Andy Flower for keeping the hopes of his team alive.
No, I actually watched Gilly for his keeping. The same way I watched Healy, and Dujon, Jayawardene and Russell etc etc...
 

Top