PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Kapil is very arguably better than Botham since he wasn’t mediocre against the best team of his era
Better bowler than Botham slightly. CATD, debatable either way.He’s behind in both.
#RandomKiwisLance Cairns and Ian Smith should be included
I know#RandomKiwis with very high strike rates
(who also won 3-0 in India)
Among those four all rounder, Kapil should be the last.You’re right. Imran and Botham and Miller are all well ahead of him.
Kapil is very arguably better than Botham since he wasn’t mediocre against the best team of his era
Botham gets way overrated in general. Had a Top 5 Peak of All Time, doesn't means I am going to ignore the rest of 2/3 of his career. But yes, overall Botham is better than Dev, mainly due to batting difference as Dev is slightly the better bowler.There has been only one all rounder who could win matches with both the bat and ball in cricket history and that’s Botham.
Even if you dissect his statistics, he remains the only cricketer to score 10+ centuries and take 10+ 5-Fer. And he did it in just 51 Tests.
I'm not sure if Kapil is India's best ever bowling allrounder, yet alone the world's best.But there isn't a single bowling allrounder remotely close to Kapil Dev.
No idea what CATD means. cat dick?Better bowler than Botham slightly. CATD, debatable either way.
Doesn’t mean you can ignore the rest of his record.Kapil is very arguably better than Botham since he wasn’t mediocre against the best team of his era
I was talking about west indies.I'm not sure if Kapil is India's best ever bowling allrounder, yet alone the world's best.
Can Agree To Disagree. Kapil was, imo, a better bowler than Botham slightly.No idea what CATD means. cat dick?
Not just WI, take last 30 years... Is there a better pacer than Kapil with 25+ batting avg other than Pollock?That's just devoid of logic.
Why use the WI.
Australia had plenty better bowling all rounders.
Miller, Lindwall, Davidson. Would pick any of those over Dev and in a heart beat.
I’m not saying Kapil is better but their records are close enough to where it’s not ridiculous to pick either one.Doesn’t mean you can ignore the rest of his record.
No. But one does average 24 (Philander)Not just WI, take last 30 years... Is there a better pacer than Kapil with 25+ batting avg other than Pollock?
Chris Woa...Not just WI, take last 30 years... Is there a better pacer than Kapil with 25+ batting avg other than Pollock?
75+ scoresThere has been only one all rounder who could win matches with both the bat and ball in cricket history and that’s Botham.
Even if you dissect his statistics, he remains the only cricketer to score 10+ centuries and take 10+ 5-Fer. And he did it in just 51 Tests.
Vettori 14 (better bat than Kapil but much worse bowler)75+ scores
Botham 16
Kapil 15
Kapil was capable of hitting lightning fast 100 against 4 ATG attack.
I would rate Flintoff ahead of Imran, Botham and Hadlee ahead in ODIs. Maybe even Kapil too.Re bowling:
Very little between Kapil and Botham.
Chris Cairns slightly behind, with Flintoff not far behind him.