• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Viv vs Lara vs Smith: Who has the best series performances?

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
How can you be certain that Smith batted without pressure in 2017? Are you implying that winning in Australia in 79 for Windies was bigger than winning in India for Aus? Let's not forget that adapting to Australian conditions for a West Indian batsman is relatively easier (due to similar pitches at home) than it is for Aussie batsmen to adapt to slow turning Indian wickets.

Besides, I sense a bias here where scoring against top fast bowling attacks is rated higher than scoring against top spin attacks. In that case Smith's 2019 Ashes should be ranked above Lara in SL 2001.
I think you may be right that Smith 2017 may be underrated. There hasn't been a batting effort close to that against Ashwin Jadeja.

Vivs effort in 79 actually did help win it for WI though.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I think you may be right that Smith 2017 may be underrated. There hasn't been a batting effort close to that against Ashwin Jadeja.

Vivs effort in 79 actually did help win it for WI though.
Yeah because WI had much better bowling also. And 2017 Australia was the closest any team had came to beating India at home in their dominant phase, largely based off the runs of a single player.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
On not just the run volume, but the quality of the innings, Smith in 2019 was insane. The first innings at Edgbaston and the 200 and 80odd were incredible innings where it looked like he was batting on a completely different pitch to his teammates. In 76, Viv had Greenidge and Fredricks as openers both having very big series.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
On not just the run volume, but the quality of the innings, Smith in 2019 was insane. The first innings at Edgbaston and the 200 and 80odd were incredible innings where it looked like he was batting on a completely different pitch to his teammates. In 76, Viv had Greenidge and Fredricks as openers both having very big series.
Marnus had a good series in 2019 but I grant your point that Smith was far ahead of others in how comfortably he batted.

The kicker for me as always was just Viv being able to achieve a super high scoring rate against a quality attack throughout a series ahead of his time.
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
How can you be certain that Smith batted without pressure in 2017? Are you implying that winning in Australia in 79 for Windies was bigger than winning in India for Aus? Let's not forget that adapting to Australian conditions for a West Indian batsman is relatively easier (due to similar pitches at home) than it is for Aussie batsmen to adapt to slow turning Indian wickets.

Besides, I sense a bias here where scoring against top fast bowling attacks is rated higher than scoring against top spin attacks. In that case Smith's 2019 Ashes should be ranked above Lara in SL 2001.
No it is an ATG series and I mean Smith’s hundred at Pune after a big first innings lead. And the rest of pitches apart from Pune where Smith scored weren’t that tough
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Let's agree to disagree then. It's the best series in India by any tourist by far and I do think Ashwin and Jadeja are better than Lillee and Thomson at home decisively.
You had Lillee, Thomson and Hogg(one of the best in the world), in some fast pitches. Viv didn’t fail in any innings unlike Smith, scored faster. And Viv’s 1979 in Aus is the best series by a touring batter there
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I disagree about the scoring rate.

It was ahead of his era. As a batting achievement, it's incredibly difficult to do so against a top attack over an entire series.
I disagree with your disagreement. Yes, it was ahead of its time; but don't necessarily think the advancement in SR has been a good change for the sport.
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Viv also had much more support though and personally don't think scoring faster is that important here.
But none of them scored even near Viv. The next highest scorer in Viv’s team was half of what he scored and after playing one more match. It was comparative to what Renshaw scored. I also think the Pune hundred was chancy(and scored after a massive first innings lead), and the Ranchi hundred was on a pancake. It’s an ATG series, but for Viv 1979 slightly better and that should not be not an irrational opinion.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
But none of them scored even near Viv. The next highest scorer in Viv’s team was half of what he scored and after playing one more match. It was comparative to what Renshaw scored. I also think the Pune hundred was chancy(and scored after a massive first innings lead), and the Ranchi hundred was on a pancake. It’s an ATG series, but for Viv 1979 slightly better and that should not be not an irrational opinion.
Again, who called it an "irrational" opinion??
 

Kirkut

International Regular
Let's agree to disagree then. It's the best series in India by any tourist by far and I do think Ashwin and Jadeja are better than Lillee and Thomson at home decisively.
I think you may be right that Smith 2017 may be underrated. There hasn't been a batting effort close to that against Ashwin Jadeja.

Vivs effort in 79 actually did help win it for WI though.
Are we pretending that the recent NZ series never happened? :ph34r:

Anyways, ignoring the horror show that just concluded, I do agree with the above.
 

Top