• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* New Zealand tour of India 2024

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
need to do some analysis on this but I think we're batting way more proactively than past teams against spin. My memories of previous India tours are a lot of nervous prodding from the crease, most of this team are very confident getting down the wicket. Also the reverse sweeps.
My memory doesn't match this, I thought past tours we tried to be proactive but it was just very very difficult, though it's possible my generalisation isn't accurate.

This exception was Taylor, who was horrible with the nervous prodding from the crease, up until he gave up and tried to hit every ball out of the park.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
My memory doesn't match this, I thought past tours we tried to be proactive but it was just very very difficult, though it's possible my generalisation isn't accurate.

This exception was Taylor, who was horrible with the nervous prodding from the crease, up until he gave up and tried to hit every ball out of the park.
Use of the reverse sweep as a strike rotation option rather than as a boundary finder has been a pretty notable addition to most of the batsmen's approaches.

That and some very unresponsive captaincy.
 

Meridio

International Regular
Yeah I think India's field settings have been one of the crucial factors. Jadeja and Ashwin may not have been as accurate as usual, though I think that's a bit of a mirage caused by the field settings - there's been singles available everywhere, so even good balls have been nudged into a gap and the strike turned over. That happens a few times and they end up trying to bowl miracle balls, overtoss it or drag it down trying to put too many revs on it and it goes for a boundary. It's a credit to our guys for (largely) taking good options with the bat too, and all these things build on each other and the result is what we're seeing.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Use of the reverse sweep as a strike rotation option rather than as a boundary finder has been a pretty notable addition to most of the batsmen's approaches.

That and some very unresponsive captaincy.
It's really getting to the point where you really have to have that shot as a core staple of your game in these conditions if you want to succeed. It turns an otherwise decent stock ball into a relatively safe strike rotation option and honestly it's hard to think of a better recommendation for a stroke in cricket than that.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
It's really getting to the point where you really have to have that shot as a core staple of your game in these conditions if you want to succeed. It turns an otherwise decent stock ball into a relatively safe strike rotation option and honestly it's hard to think of a better recommendation for a stroke in cricket than that.
I don't think it is actually that safe, every time I've looked the runs per dismissal on the reverse are below average. It's effective because it must be so annoying as a bowler having what used to be your bread and butter stock delivery going for runs, most of them won't hold their nerve and play the averages.

if you're a poor player of spin learning to reverse essentially turns the game from "get worked over and eventually caught behind or LBW" to a high variance dice roll, which is a handy thing when you don't have months of time to develop a proper all round spin game.
 

Coronis

International Coach
I don't think it is actually that safe, every time I've looked the runs per dismissal on the reverse are below average. It's effective because it must be so annoying as a bowler having what used to be your bread and butter stock delivery going for runs, most of them won't hold their nerve and play the averages.

if you're a poor player of spin learning to reverse essentially turns the game from "get worked over and eventually caught behind or LBW" to a high variance dice roll, which is a handy thing when you don't have months of time to develop a proper all round spin game.
Where are these stats?
 

King Kane

International Regular
Hopefully we can add another hundred runs to this lead.

The lead should be enough already but we can't rely on India batting recklessly and throwing away their wickets again.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
Yes, and I’m asking where you’re getting this information?
I scrape cricinfo data and load it up in python. Haven't run the numbers on this specific one recently though, last time I checked it was kinda what you'd expect (below average runs per dismissal but high SR)
 

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
Rubbish commentary. All they are talking about how good India should bat and not how quickly they should wrap NZ now in order to have a slight chance
 

Top