• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Martin Crowe's Top 50 Greatest Cricketers of Six Generations

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Not sure why Godfrey Evans was picked above the likes of Les Ames or Flower.
As he writes of selection criteria, Crowe explains that he isn't comparing eras and that rather players "are judged or selected by the standards of the eras in which they performed".

Ames was not a guaranteed selection for a World XI in his era ahead of Oldfield and Cameron in the early 30s. Likewise, Flower was behind Gilchrist.

Crowe also writes of players inspiring reverence and the importance of longevity.

Evans was judged the best of his era, and as perhaps the best pure keeper to have played the game he was revered. Finally, 91 tests as a keeper in an era of poor pitches and worse protective gear is insanely good. It is still the 6th most tests as a keeper behind Boucher, Healy, Gilchrist, Marsh, and Knott (just behind the latter 3). That's a remarkable stat.
 

Coronis

International Coach
As he writes of selection criteria, Crowe explains that he isn't comparing eras and that rather players "are judged or selected by the standards of the eras in which they performed".

Ames was not a guaranteed selection for a World XI in his era ahead of Oldfield and Cameron in the early 30s. Likewise, Flower was behind Gilchrist.

Crowe also writes of players inspiring reverence and the importance of longevity.

Evans was judged the best of his era, and as perhaps the best pure keeper to have played the game he was revered. Finally, 91 tests as a keeper in an era of poor pitches and worse protective gear is insanely good. It is still the 6th most tests as a keeper behind Boucher, Healy, Gilchrist, Marsh, and Knott (just behind the latter 3). That's a remarkable stat.
Always good to have the context behind a list.
 

Top