Possibly because he was a brilliant keeper?Not sure why Godfrey Evans was picked above the likes of Les Ames or Flower.
Why, why, why would you go there?He’s definitely above Barry Richards
He won't!!!
Why waste good bait?He won't!!!
As he writes of selection criteria, Crowe explains that he isn't comparing eras and that rather players "are judged or selected by the standards of the eras in which they performed".Not sure why Godfrey Evans was picked above the likes of Les Ames or Flower.
He said players had to have retired, and Sanga was a current player at the time of writing.I would say the 10 most noticeable players missing (not in any order):
- Mike Procter
- Joel Garner
- Ray Lindwall
- Alan Davidson
- Shaun Pollock
- KS Ranjitsinhji
- Ken Barrington
- Aubrey Faulkner
- Kumar Sangakkara
- Wilfred Rhodes
Always good to have the context behind a list.As he writes of selection criteria, Crowe explains that he isn't comparing eras and that rather players "are judged or selected by the standards of the eras in which they performed".
Ames was not a guaranteed selection for a World XI in his era ahead of Oldfield and Cameron in the early 30s. Likewise, Flower was behind Gilchrist.
Crowe also writes of players inspiring reverence and the importance of longevity.
Evans was judged the best of his era, and as perhaps the best pure keeper to have played the game he was revered. Finally, 91 tests as a keeper in an era of poor pitches and worse protective gear is insanely good. It is still the 6th most tests as a keeper behind Boucher, Healy, Gilchrist, Marsh, and Knott (just behind the latter 3). That's a remarkable stat.
Courtney WalshI would say the 10 most noticeable players missing (not in any order):
- Mike Procter
- Joel Garner
- Ray Lindwall
- Alan Davidson
- Shaun Pollock
- KS Ranjitsinhji
- Ken Barrington
- Aubrey Faulkner
- Kumar Sangakkara
- Wilfred Rhodes