Henry actually points at the keeper's end.If a bowler's-end call came it could only have been from the bowler (Henry) as the other infielders weren't as involved. Or it might just have been Blundell only.
Anyway, it was a mess all round.
Time to introduce some different bowlers, probably.
Fair enough. I still wonder about that because he was no chance throwing to the bowler's with a glove on. I've watched it a few times now and it looks like he's only thinking of staying at the stumps, then sees it's a **** throw, completely forgets about his stumps and thinks his only option is the bowler's.Nah I think he just decided on his own that it was bowler's end. If you look at what he does after he collects the ball, he never even looks at the keeper's end - it doesn't seem to occur to him that the opportunity is at his end and Sarfaraz was never in danger.
Yeah this is what I mean about lacking game awareness. He just sees the throw being loopy and thinks he has to rush out and get it without taking anything else into consideration.Fair enough. I still wonder about that because he was no chance throwing to the bowler's with a glove on. I've watched it a few times now and it looks like he's only thinking of staying at the stumps, then sees it's a **** throw, completely forgets about his stumps and thinks his only option is the bowler's.
There's every chance that's the turning point in the Test. We absolutely need wickets before the new ball.