subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Ponting rather easily. The only thing that makes it closer is that Kallis ended better. But Ponting was a more dangerous bat.
More dangerous for Australia, sure.Ponting rather easily. The only thing that makes it closer is that Kallis ended better. But Ponting was a more dangerous bat.
Kallis rather narrowly. The only thing that makes it close is that Ponting started better. But Kallis was a more reliable bat.
BasicallyPonting rather easily. The only thing that makes it closer is that Kallis ended better. But Ponting was a more dangerous bat.
None of them are haters lol. They just don’t rate those players as highly as others do.You definitely are, embrace it.
Subz and Ashwin
PEWS and Coronis for Viv and Lillee
Etc etc.
I could use this as the definition of hate and you can do nothing about it.None of them are haters lol. They just don’t rate those players as highly as others do.
everyone is a hater at heart, you just need to grow into the maturity to embrace it etcNone of them are haters lol. They just don’t rate those players as highly as others do.
No. He voted for Ashwin against Holding.Eh, feel like you go with the flow a lot if you catch my meaning.
Nah I’d choose Woakes. No one beats Woakes except Jadeja and maybe Ashwin.No. He voted for Ashwin against Holding.
Also he would choose brook over woakes.
Ok he might be a cocaine addict just like usNo. He voted for Ashwin against Holding.
Also he would choose brook over woakes.
Yeah.Nah I’d choose Woakes. No one beats Woakes except Jadeja and maybe Warner.
You have started acknowledging this. That's progressThe only thing that makes it closer is that Kallis ended better.
Everyone has to be a hater because at the end all cricketers suck once you apply the correct set of stat filters.everyone is a hater at heart, you just need to grow into the maturity to embrace it etc
I think I acknowledged this sometime ago.You have started acknowledging this. That's progress
Let's break it down.
Ponting had a better start to his career than Kallis, and then was notably ahead in his peak. Ponting's decline started around 2007/8, but Kallis had his own dip around 2008. However, unlike Ponting who had a long decline, Kallis had a revival period of 29 tests before dipping again at the end of his career.
So Kallis really only could be rated ahead of Ponting 2009 onwards, a period of 29 tests which isnt enough to overhaul Ponting's superiority before that.
100% agree.Everyone has to be a hater because at the end all cricketers suck (except for Jadeja, Woakes ,Warner and Rubel) once you apply the correct set of stat filters.
Everyone I like gets the filters that make them look better and everyone I dislike gets the filters that make them look worseEveryone has to be a hater because at the end all cricketers suck once you apply the correct set of stat filters.