not enough 90mphStokes has been a major upgrade on Root, but he hasn't been able to shift England's misery v the lower order.
England aren't batting yetStokes has been a major upgrade on Root, but he hasn't been able to shift England's misery v the lower order.
Even Wood struggles v the tail. Not enough emphasis on the stumps.not enough 90mph
Yeah, we need someone like Starc, who can bowl an accurate yorker at good speeds.Even Wood struggles v the tail. Not enough emphasis on the stumps.
Didn't look like he hit it anyway. Slips and keeper didn't appeal (although they have been wrong once this Test).Why does no Hawkeye mean you can't review a caught behind decision? That makes absolutely no sense.
Yeah it didn't seem like an edge to me. Just can't understand the logic behind no Hawkeye meaning no DRS.Didn't look like he hit it anyway. Slips and keeper didn't appeal (although they have been wrong once this Test).
Apparently DRS was fine the previous over to overturn a wicket too? Pakistan have had some insane luck in this TestDRS all of a sudden down when England finally get a wicket?
Or on the other hand England were lucky not to lose a review.Apparently DRS was fine the previous over to overturn a wicket too? Pakistan have had some insane luck in this Test
ngl this sounds like cheating, are we back in the 80s?Apparently DRS was fine the previous over to overturn a wicket too? Pakistan have had some insane luck in this Test
This is garbage.ngl this sounds like cheating, are we back in the 80s?
Only going by what I've heard TBFOr on the other hand England were lucky not to lose a review.