huh i didn't even mean to post that. happened completely on its own.It's not a histogram it's a bar chart.
It would become a histogram once Azam Khan enters the records.It's not a histogram it's a bar chart.
I mean it highlights how many more tests he’s played than anything.View attachment 41910
Why did they use the cricketers’ images in the histogram? I’ve never seen that done before but at least it highlights how Root is miles ahead of every other Test batter at the moment.
Yep, Root 50 Tests, Karunaratne & Khawaja 29, Smith and Labuschagne 34I mean it highlights how many more tests he’s played than anything.
How realistic is this?View attachment 41910
Why did they use the cricketers’ images in the histogram? I’ve never seen that done before but at least it highlights how Root is miles ahead of every other Test batter at the moment.
That's accounted for in the graph by Root's thighs being included, rather than being shown from the waist up like the othersI mean it highlights how many more tests he’s played than anything.
Maybe the averages tell a better story:Yep, Root 50 Tests, Karunaratne & Khawaja 29, Smith and Labuschagne 34
From 1 Jan 2021 your averages are off for Root (58.32) Labuschagne (45.10) and Smith (47.07)Maybe the averages tell a better story:
Root 57
Karunaratne 50.6
Khawaja 53.4
Labuschagne 43.7
Smith 44.7
Worth noting that Pope has the same amount of runs as Smith too.
Ah, hadn't changed the 15th Jan to the 1st on the query, so missed out on one Test (Sydney Aus v Ind) where of course Smith and Labu scored heavily. Was wondering why my stats had one less Test on those 2 to yours. Also didn't include Root's latest effort....From 1 Jan 2021 your averages are off for Root (58.32) Labuschagne (45.10) and Smith (47.07)
Also Pope doesn't have same runs as Smith and are nowhere near comparable
Smith has 34 Tests, 2488 runs @ 47.07
Pope has 37 Tests, 2236 runs @ 33.87