Nintendo
Cricketer Of The Year
Livingstone can't really do the moeen role with the ball though. Mo worked so well because despite not taking wickets, his econ was 5.3. England had worked out a way to fairly consistently go at ~6 an over from 10 to 35 while batting, and moeen+rashid where able to keep opponents to a slightly slower RR (and take wickets in rashid's case) while plunkett hammered away the back of a length balls with 3 fielders on the fence for the 6 attempts. Moeen bowled in 92% of the ODI's he played and averaged 7 overs a game, so far livingstone has bowled in 76% of his odi's and averaged 4 overs a game while going at 0.4 runs an over more than moeen.He should be batting at seven in this line up and as long as you have another batter who bowls, like Jacks, that's fine. Livingstone is replacing Mo. His returns won't be consistent but he'll contribute in either discipline in one way or another.
Add to that the fact that rashid is no longer taking wickets, and england don't have a plunkett replacement, and it becomes a lot harder to see livingstone filling in the hole moeen did witht he ball, despite a better bowling average.