LangleyburyCCPlayer
State 12th Man
It’s all well and good to pick players from the County Championship, but when it’s pushed to the margins of the English summer (and when Somerset get deducted points for producing spinning wickets!), it’s not necessarily going to be the best proving ground for some players, and likewise, it might mean some players succeed domestically but might not have the tools to do it internationallyThe mistake you’re making here is that because the numbers supported the other selections, that the numbers must have been their rationale.
If we ignore Parkinson, who doesn’t really count, Livingstone is the only one you can really point to as not delivering. Well Jamie Overton didn’t set the world alight with the ball in his one chance, though scored a handy 97…
Saqib and Fisher weren’t McCullum era selections.
Jacks was definitely not an orthodox selection, and he wasn’t really ‘dropped’ they just wanted to give Rehan a whirl with the series won. Lo and behold that went well.
Harry Brook has been an unheralded success. Potts has done fairly well. Atkinson has started like a train. Hartley took 7 on debut. Bashir has done enough for his place to be safe for the time being. Jamie Smith a revelation. Tongue impressive in his two games to date, and would have likely played in India but for his injury troubles.
And then as I say. You add Duckett, and keeping faith in Crawley and Pope when the stats said not to.
They have picked players well. It’s seriously hard to dispute. The fact that you and others think conventional wisdom would have led to some being selected anyway doesn’t mean they used conventional wisdom to make those picks. That’s the big flaw in your line of thinking.
Forget all that ‘saving Test cricket’ bollocks but the output shows they do largely know what they’re doing.