Nah he still thinks Ambrose is a top ATGTwo of Subz biggest targets.
Nah, top two are Ashwin and JadejaTwo of Subz biggest targets.
Ashwin. He just finds Jadeja’s sample size a problemNah, top two are Ashwin and Jadeja
He has problem with both of them, he magically doesn't have any problems with many players with even smaller sample sizes like Laker.Ashwin. He just finds Jadeja’s sample size a problem
With Ashwin cause he’s older and played many more matches abroad, so Subz labels him a failure outside SC basis that. Jadeja has decent stats in Aus and SA, just a very small sample sizeHe has problem with both of them, he magically doesn't have any problems with many players with even smaller sample sizes like Laker.
We all know that Subs just needs an excuse really..... His hatred towards Ashwin and Jadeja is borderline irrational.With Ashwin cause he’s older and played many more matches abroad, so Subz labels him a failure outside SC basis that. Jadeja has decent stats in Aus and SA, just a very small sample size
I also don’t agree with his assessment of Ashwin(and Hobbs) especially, but on most of the things i kinda agree with Subz, especially Viv, Kohli, Tendulkar, Imran etc. Btw basis a recent comparison Subz rated Jadeja over Stokes, so progress!We all know that Subs just needs an excuse really..... His hatred towards Ashwin and Jadeja is borderline irrational.
I know, I also agree plenty with him, but there are certain players his criticism is most often irrational and they include Ashwin, Jadeja, Kallis, Ambrose and Lara.I also don’t agree with his assessment of Ashwin(and Hobbs) especially, but on most of the things i kinda agree with Subz, especially Viv, Kohli, Tendulkar, Imran etc
I am biased against Kallis, so I’ll stay silent(although I admit I don’t mind that much of a difference between Ponting, Kallis and Sanga as bats). I’ll vote any of the absolute top tier ATGs in a primary disciple over Kallis. The irritation started when some morons started calling him Sachin+Zaheer where he is comfortably behind both in either disciplineI know, I also agree plenty with him, but there are certain players his criticism is most often irrational and they include Ashwin, Jadeja, Kallis, Ambrose and Lara.
I mean, why??I am biased against Kallis, so I’ll stay silent(although I admit I don’t mind that much of a difference between Ponting, Kallis and Sanga as bats). I’ll vote any of the absolute top tier ATGs in a primary disciple over Kallis
Started when some people started calling him Sachin+Zaheer and the greatest player of all timeI mean, why??
Can't really complain then..... If I have a bias against any batter, it's probably a bit against Ponting.Started when some people started calling him Sachin+Zaheer and the greatest player of all time
Yeah fair enough here. I'm a big Kallis fan but he's clearly inferior to Tendulkar as a batsman and Zak as a bowler. People who advocate that are definitely over egging the pudding.Started when some people started calling him Sachin+Zaheer and the greatest player of all time
You mean if they are being compared with players with bigger samples of failure? Sure.He has problem with both of them, he magically doesn't have any problems with many players with even smaller sample sizes like Laker.
Yup.Ambrose in primary discipline maybe. Kallis as an overall cricketer.