capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
You know what I mean...... Laker's away record is literally as successful as Jadeja's.You mean if they are being compared with players with bigger samples of failure? Sure.
You know what I mean...... Laker's away record is literally as successful as Jadeja's.You mean if they are being compared with players with bigger samples of failure? Sure.
Kinda funny how you and @subshakerz mark Kallis down for being overrated and underrated respectively. I say you fight.Started when some people started calling him Sachin+Zaheer and the greatest player of all time
I have been similarly accused for Sehwag, Steyn, Hadlee, Marshall too now. It's getting funny to see. Basically anywhere I see a player being overrated a bit or much I will comment.I know, I also agree plenty with him, but there are certain players his criticism is most often irrational and they include Ashwin, Jadeja, Kallis, Ambrose and Lara.
I take into account the time period.You know what I mean...... Laker's away record is literally as successful as Jadeja's.
Yeah, and even I think older players like Laker should be scrutinized equally and there poor away record should not be glossed over, like you do, just to prove them>Jadeja, Ashwin. Found it funny after all that you somehow questioned Hobbs...... Especially funny, you don't even rate Grum, but still voted for him against Ashwin and yourself admitted that. "See a player get overrated" My butt, after this you will have the audacity to say that. Like for instance, everyone but Kyear rates Marshall and McGrath close, even to an extent he too.I take into account the time period.
I don't see the inconsistency. I still put Hobbs in the top ten cricketers of all-time and top 5 bats ever. I still put Marshall and McGrath no.1 and 2 pacers. And Laker and Grimmett > Ashwin. I consider Lyon a better spinner than Ashwin and don't think Lyon is in the five best spinners ever.Yeah, and even I think older players like Laker should be scrutinized equally and there poor away record should not be glossed over, like you do, just to prove them>Jadeja, Ashwin. Found it funny after all that you somehow questioned Hobbs...... Especially funny, you don't even rate Grum, but still voted for him against Ashwin and yourself admitted that. "See a player get overrated" My butt, after this you will have the audacity to say that. Like for instance, everyone but Kyear rates Marshall and McGrath close, even to an extent he too.
Yeah, will talk about it sometimes later again.I don't see the inconsistency. I still put Hobbs in the top ten cricketers of all-time and top 5 bats ever. I still put Marshall and McGrath no.1 and 2 pacers. And Laker and Grimmett > Ashwin. I consider Lyon a better spinner than Ashwin and don't think Lyon is in the five best spinners ever.
Exactly. It's over the top and all for obvious reasons.I know, I also agree plenty with him, but there are certain players his criticism is most often irrational and they include Ashwin, Jadeja, Kallis, Ambrose and Lara.
On a separate note though, I was re-reading the Kensington crowd part in Sunny Days and I don't think that really was racist. Biased and very opinionated and way too harsh yes, but not sure if there is really a racist connotation. His treatment of Doshi and comment after Hookes death were worse.
Probably?Can't really complain then..... If I have a bias against any batter, it's probably a bit against Ponting.
How can all these players be explained by Imran bias? What do Ashwin, Sehwag, Hobbs and Lara have to do with him?Exactly. It's over the top and all for obvious reasons.
Never said they weren't close.Yeah, and even I think older players like Laker should be scrutinized equally and there poor away record should not be glossed over, like you do, just to prove them>Jadeja, Ashwin. Found it funny after all that you somehow questioned Hobbs...... Especially funny, you don't even rate Grum, but still voted for him against Ashwin and yourself admitted that. "See a player get overrated" My butt, after this you will have the audacity to say that. Like for instance, everyone but Kyear rates Marshall and McGrath close, even to an extent he too.
You know very well the reasons for Ashwin and Jadeja.How can all these players be explained by Imran bias? What do Ashwin, Sehwag, Hobbs and Lara have to do with him?
Sure...Never said they weren't close.
I have them clearly 1 / 2 / 3. Doesn't mean there's a gulf, they are in the same tier.
I already said that. I mentioned you because you are probably the only one to have Marshall Top 3 and still don't think the Gulf is huge. The idea that Marshall is getting overrated is quite wild to me.Never said they weren't close.
I have them clearly 1 / 2 / 3. Doesn't mean there's a gulf, they are in the same tier.
No I don't. Please level your accusation clearly because in the past you stated that I am not doing it out of nationalist or anti-India bias.You know very well the reasons for Ashwin and Jadeja.
Ambrose and Kallis and now the other two and for Imran
Lara is to prove the distinction and gap between him and Sachin.
If I say Marshall is the best bowler ever but also overrated, what does that mean to you?I already said that. I mentioned you because you are probably the only one to have Marshall Top 3 and still don't think the Gulf is huge. The idea that Marshall is getting overrated is quite wild to me.
That means that you think Marshall is the best bowler but also overratedIf I say Marshall is the best bowler ever but also overrated, what does that mean to you?
There's a wide open gap for players to enter into the top 3 position. For the record I also have McGrath and Hadlee in the top 6.I already said that. I mentioned you because you are probably the only one to have Marshall Top 3 and still don't think the Gulf is huge. The idea that Marshall is getting overrated is quite wild to me.
Yeah, and I don't think there's any problem with that. He definitely have an argument, but I don't necessarily rate him that high. My Top tier is also around the same, though the order isn't, and Viv isn't there (just hoping it is Viv not Barry) for Imran.There's a wide open gap for players to enter into the top 3 position. For the record I also have McGrath and Hadlee in the top 6.
If you go according the Wisden votes, the candidates are Richards, Hobbs and Warne
If you go by the boring for the Cricinfo team the top vote getters would be Warne and Sachin.
Can you tell me that Marshall doesn't have as good an argument as any of them for 3rd.
A quarter of the forum are arguing that bowlers are more valuable, yet they are mostly ignored. Outside of Bradman no one had a massive advantage over anyone else, so why can't the best bowler, a certified match winner and objectively a better bowler than Warne, be no. 3?
Bradman
Sobers
Marshall
Hobbs
McGrath / Hadlee
Richards
Tendulkar
That's my absolute top tier.
You are defying cricket consensus, which you care so much about to downplay Imran, in rating Marshall so high.There's a wide open gap for players to enter into the top 3 position. For the record I also have McGrath and Hadlee in the top 6.
If you go according the Wisden votes, the candidates are Richards, Hobbs and Warne
If you go by the boring for the Cricinfo team the top vote getters would be Warne and Sachin.
Can you tell me that Marshall doesn't have as good an argument as any of them for 3rd.
Wisden's all time cricket teamYou are defying cricket consensus, which you care so much about to downplay Imran, in rating Marshall so high.
And didn't you rate Hobbs behind Tendulkar?