• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ravichandran Ashwin vs Clarrie Grimmett

Who is the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    25

Coronis

International Coach
Hmm, the whole discussion was triggered by him saying Grimmett was "easily" better.

A guy like O'Reilly is easily better, yes. Claiming it for Grimmett is very dubious and makes it feel like clear flaws are being swept aside.
Oh well yeah I don’t think any of them are easily better than one another which is why I started that other thread in the first place. There’s definitely a decent gap behind O’Reilly and then a bunch fighting for the fourth best spinner, imo
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
Surely averaging 24 while bowling to people with bats smaller than toothpicks makes you an absolutely terrible bowler.
Not any worse than taking 70 plus percent of your wicket in rank turners. Anyway Sehwag is barely a top 40-50 batsman ever and Grimmett bowled to lot superior players than Sehwag.
 
Last edited:

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
He also doesn't pass the eye test at all. From most footage, seems to be a very slow floaty spinner who doesn't put his body into his action much. Overrated.

"This ball I called my offbreak flipper, it proved to be a very successful ball, being much harder to detect then my ordinary googly because I did not have to drop my left shoulder to bowl it." C.V Grimmett.

"Both Grimmett and Pepper could bowl a bosie by some means other than out of the back of the hand. Clarrie spent years perfecting his offbreak "flicker" (sic) and then schooled Cec Pepper in the skill. Clarrie Grimmett was the greatest slow bowler the world has seen and I doubt we will see his like again." D.G Bradman
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Not any worse than taking 70 plus percent of your wicket in rank turners. Anyway Sehwag is barely a top 40-50 batsman ever and Grimmett bowled to lot superior players.
Ashwin averages 21.15 in home games where the average runs per wicket was 31.26. Remind me again, exactly how much are people supposed to average bowling on rank turners? How many runs should be made on them?

Grimmett in no way comprehensible bowled to more superior players. Requires basic ignorance of general talent improvement over the years and all over the world.
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
Grimmett in no way comprehensible bowled to more superior players. Requires basic ignorance of general talent improvement over the years and all over the world.
Better players than Sehwag. There is no doubting in my mind Grimmett would have succeeded against anyone in any era. If you read about Grimmett and his writing regarding spin bowling, you would have no doubt that the guy was a Genius.

“The Newton of Slow Bowling.”


Roland Perry wrote a couple of biographies about Warne. They are ok. Perry had access to Bradman and wrote several "cash-in" books based on that access, including Bradmans all time greatest test team. Perry pestered Bradman right up to his death to drop Grimmett and replace him with Warne which Bradman would never do . Perry gives Bradman a chance to include Warne and drop Grimmett even after Warne is made one of wisdens 5 cricketers of the 20th century but Bradman remained conviced that Grimmett was a better bowler than Warne.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Better players than Sehwag. There is no doubting in my mind Grimmett would have succeeded against anyone in any era. If you read about Grimmett and his writing regarding spin bowling, you would have no doubt that the guy was a Genius.

“The Newton of Slow Bowling.”


Roland Perry wrote a couple of biographies about Warne. They are ok. Perry had access to Bradman and wrote several "cash-in" books based on that access, including Bradmans all time greatest test team. Perry pestered Bradman right up to his death to drop Grimmett and replace him with Warne which Bradman would never do . Perry gives Bradman a chance to include Warne and drop Grimmett even after Warne is made one of wisdens 5 cricketers of the 20th century but Bradman remained conviced that Grimmett was a better bowler than Warne.
Nothing here is an argument for Grimmett over Ashwin. Peer reviews are notoriously all over the place, and given the actual records of these two players, you can hardly say Grimmett dominated over a better group of players compared to Ashwin. If you decided not to trust basic facts and such that's fine, but you have to tell people that such things aren't important rather than pretend like you're making a case based off reality.
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
If we're talking specifically about batting ability vs spin, imo there were literally 0 players better than Sehwag in Grimmett's era.
Bradman by far. Grimmett held his own against him.

Hobbs, Hammond, Sutcliffe are at least equal or comparable. All 3 played some ridiculous innings on turners. Hammond on particular was said to be the finest player of slow spin bowling in the world, some said all time. Better than Bradman by some. Headley himself was a damn good player of spin. Those guys are better batsman than Sehwag in general and at least comparable or not that far from Sehwag against Spin.

Guys like Nourse, Leyland and Ponsford were very fine players of spin themself.
 

Top