Oh well yeah I don’t think any of them are easily better than one another which is why I started that other thread in the first place. There’s definitely a decent gap behind O’Reilly and then a bunch fighting for the fourth best spinner, imoHmm, the whole discussion was triggered by him saying Grimmett was "easily" better.
A guy like O'Reilly is easily better, yes. Claiming it for Grimmett is very dubious and makes it feel like clear flaws are being swept aside.
Seems to have flighted the ball a lot. Sehwag would like to face him.
With bat smaller than a toothpick. I would like to see that encounter as well. On gluepot even more.Seems to have flighted the ball a lot. Sehwag would like to face him.
I definitely forgot that.With bat smaller than a toothpick.
Surely averaging 24 while bowling to people with bats smaller than toothpicks makes you an absolutely terrible bowler.With bat smaller than a toothpick. I would like to see that encounter as well. On gluepot even more.
Does it? Wouldn't that make Bill O'Reilly a terrible bowler? Average of 22.6 isn't much better than 24.Surely averaging 24 while bowling to people with bats smaller than toothpicks makes you an absolutely terrible bowler.
Absolutely will, should average no more than 2 going against toothpick wielding weaklings.Does it? Wouldn't that make Bill O'Reilly a terrible bowler? Average of 22.6 isn't much better than 24.
2 sounds a bit less. We can agree at 5.Absolutely will, should average no more than 2 going against toothpick wielding weaklings.
fair enough, but only if the toothpicks are above average sized.2 sounds a bit less. We can agree at 5.
Done dealfair enough, but only if the toothpicks are above average sized.
Not any worse than taking 70 plus percent of your wicket in rank turners. Anyway Sehwag is barely a top 40-50 batsman ever and Grimmett bowled to lot superior players than Sehwag.Surely averaging 24 while bowling to people with bats smaller than toothpicks makes you an absolutely terrible bowler.
He also doesn't pass the eye test at all. From most footage, seems to be a very slow floaty spinner who doesn't put his body into his action much. Overrated.
Ashwin averages 21.15 in home games where the average runs per wicket was 31.26. Remind me again, exactly how much are people supposed to average bowling on rank turners? How many runs should be made on them?Not any worse than taking 70 plus percent of your wicket in rank turners. Anyway Sehwag is barely a top 40-50 batsman ever and Grimmett bowled to lot superior players.
Freeman was more like Grimmett and liked to bowl against the wind. Although Grimmett did use the tailwind sometimes on slower English wickets and also when he bowled his mystery ball.Grimmett's action was almost similar to that of Tich Freeman.
Better players than Sehwag. There is no doubting in my mind Grimmett would have succeeded against anyone in any era. If you read about Grimmett and his writing regarding spin bowling, you would have no doubt that the guy was a Genius.Grimmett in no way comprehensible bowled to more superior players. Requires basic ignorance of general talent improvement over the years and all over the world.
Nothing here is an argument for Grimmett over Ashwin. Peer reviews are notoriously all over the place, and given the actual records of these two players, you can hardly say Grimmett dominated over a better group of players compared to Ashwin. If you decided not to trust basic facts and such that's fine, but you have to tell people that such things aren't important rather than pretend like you're making a case based off reality.Better players than Sehwag. There is no doubting in my mind Grimmett would have succeeded against anyone in any era. If you read about Grimmett and his writing regarding spin bowling, you would have no doubt that the guy was a Genius.
“The Newton of Slow Bowling.”
Roland Perry wrote a couple of biographies about Warne. They are ok. Perry had access to Bradman and wrote several "cash-in" books based on that access, including Bradmans all time greatest test team. Perry pestered Bradman right up to his death to drop Grimmett and replace him with Warne which Bradman would never do . Perry gives Bradman a chance to include Warne and drop Grimmett even after Warne is made one of wisdens 5 cricketers of the 20th century but Bradman remained conviced that Grimmett was a better bowler than Warne.
If we're talking specifically about batting ability vs spin, imo there were literally 0 players better than Sehwag in Grimmett's era.Better players than Sehwag.
Bradman by far. Grimmett held his own against him.If we're talking specifically about batting ability vs spin, imo there were literally 0 players better than Sehwag in Grimmett's era.