subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
To what extent does having an exceptional versus a poor cordon affect the records of these pacers? What would their records look like if they switched cordons?
Not that much. It was neutral umpires often by the 90s.One would be better the other would be worse. How much was Wasim benefitting from home umpiring though?
He would not have been as effective, everything you're saying is true.More importantly, what would Mcgrath average of he had Aamir Sohail shelling a catch in the slips off his bowling once a week? Would he have continued with his same corridor bowling MO and retained his effectiveness or be forced to bowl a straighter line somewhat negating the advantages his height gave him and blunting the effectiveness of his most prolific mode of dismissal?
That he wouldn't have been as effective as he was. Thank you for the admission. It took years of pointless back and forth.He would not have been as effective, everything you're saying is true.
But what's the point?
More importantly, what would Wasim average if he didn't have the reverse swing and guaranteed lbws, and played on bouncier wickets? Would he have continued with his same attack the stumps bowling and retained his effectiveness or be forced to bowl a wider line somewhat negating the advantages his swing gave him and blunting the effectiveness of his most prolific mode of dismissal?More importantly, what would Mcgrath average of he had Aamir Sohail shelling a catch in the slips off his bowling once a week? Would he have continued with his same corridor bowling MO and retained his effectiveness or be forced to bowl a straighter line somewhat negating the advantages his height gave him and blunting the effectiveness of his most prolific mode of dismissal?
Please take it to the what would wasim average without ball tampering threadMore importantly, what would Wasim average if he didn't have the reverse swing and guaranteed lbws, and played on bouncier wickets? Would he have continued with his same attack the stumps bowling and retained his effectiveness or be forced to bowl a wider line somewhat negating the advantages his swing gave him and blunting the effectiveness of his most prolific mode of dismissal?
Wasim - 20 , McGrath - 35To what extent does having an exceptional versus a poor cordon affect the records of these pacers? What would their records look like if they switched cordons?
Actually scratch that, Wasim was a magician with the ball so Wasim - 17 , McGrath - 35.Wasim - 20 , McGrath - 35
I mean, McGrath also had pretty decent support at home.... Don't again want to bring up the 1999 Sachin outsGood point from FJ. Home umpiring + ball tampering + slip cordons all normalised, I'd say Wasim career average of ~30, McGrath ~ 20
1 neutral, one home.Not that much. It was neutral umpires often by the 90s.
Most of the great ones had tremendous cordons, were taking away from each of them?That he wouldn't have been as effective as he was. Thank you for the admission. It took years of pointless back and forth.
Actually you yourself do penalize Bradman for this lmaoIt's part of the game, Bradman played on pancakes and didn't face any great bowlers and feasted on minnows.
Aussie umps?I mean, McGrath also had pretty decent support at home.... Don't again want to bring up the 1999 Sachin outs
I think especially that 99 tour and those great Aussie umps have been discussed here on more than a few occasions.Aussie umps?