ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
Try Imran Khan. He improves every team.If you're talking about shoring up weaknesses, having Headley at 3 isn't one. That was the core of the discussion.
But no one said he wasn't better.
Try Imran Khan. He improves every team.If you're talking about shoring up weaknesses, having Headley at 3 isn't one. That was the core of the discussion.
But no one said he wasn't better.
You are aware that kyear2 didn't coin that term "Black Bradman." The media, because of how much Headley carried the WI in the 30s bestowed it on him. West Indians tongue in cheek termed Bradman the "White Headley. " All acknowledged that it was a pardonable exaggeration. Sheesh !!Black Bradman.
Yes, players like Imran, Sobers, Hadlee, Kallis, Gilchrist and Bradman all bring something extra to all teams....imo. The top shelf all rounders are negligibly worse than the specialists, while being supremely better in their secondary skill. Gilchrist is Gilchrist and Bradman needs no introduction.Try Imran Khan. He improves every team.
Sacrilege. Seems like you missed the thousand hoops that kyear2 jumped to show how there was a huge gap between Imran and bowlers above him, and minuscule gap between him and the next 55.Try Imran Khan. He improves every team.
In Tests i will prefer Lara over Sachin due to his ability to score big scores.You can’t be much of a 90s fan if you didn’t pick the one guy who was the best in the 90s…
Literally what he was called. I'm lost.Black Bradman.
The lengths that some of these people go to.You are aware that kyear2 didn't coin that term "Black Bradman." The media, because of how much Headley carried the WI in the 30s bestowed it on him. West Indians tongue in cheek termed Bradman the "White Headley. " All acknowledged that it was a pardonable exaggeration. Sheesh !!
Sacrilege. Seems like you missed the thousand hoops that kyear2 jumped to show how there was a huge gap between Imran and bowlers above him, and minuscule gap between him and the next 55.
Also secondary skills don't count. Unless it's fielding. And that too, only slip fielding.
Compared to batting and bowling, it really isn't.You'll are the ones that have been trying to say that slip fielding isn't important.
That's why some teams, despite having the talent never made it to the top.Compared to batting and bowling, it really isn't.
Your post is silly.That's why some teams, despite having the talent never made it to the top.
And you'll can laugh as much as you want, but also why Pakistan literally dropped the opportunity to complete against Australia this year. It's never been seen as a priority
It's hilarious how we look at stats and not impact. Australia, West Indies and South Africa I would wager won more games because of their slip cordons than with 5th bowlers and lower order batting combined.
But to acknowledge that is to elevate Kallis, and we can't have that.
Yeah, I guess you now realize how silly your points sounds regarding the comparing batting and bowling to fielding.Hence why it's something that should be made a priority and part of the game from a young age. Part of the culture.
It's no different from batting and bowling, it requires natural talent, but also needs to be cultivated
No.Yeah, I guess you now realize how silly your points sounds regarding the comparing batting and bowling to fielding.
NO. Just No.Slip Fielding plays a Crucial role in Wins. One catch can change the match. This is the main difference between Australia and Pakistan. Talent Wise Pakistan has the ability to dominate any Country but Poor Leadership and Poor Fielding cost them too many ICC Trophies.
Your checklist is missing how Headley fielded in the slip cordon on the tour match against Durham.Perhaps the people who called Headley “Black Bradman” should get on cricket web and analyse his performances away from home, on a full moon, against ATG spin attacks and compare that to Bradman and then only have the right to make such an analogy,