Inzi was a proper innings builder and didn't have the advantage of batting down the order like VVS who had a nice cushion to rely on.It’s really close weighing the superior statistical accomplishment of Inzi against the track record against the best team of their time of VVS.
I would go with the latter because I value innings of consequence against the best and VVS had more.
like the 281 inEden Gardens or the 96 at Durban, sure…Inzi was a proper innings builder and didn't have the advantage of batting down the order like VVS who had a nice cushion to rely on.
The problem is that between those great knocks, Laxmans consistency and output wasn't quite there whereas it was with Inzi. Kinda like why KP doesn't get rated higherAre there any memorable match winning knocks against top nations from Inzi that come close to any of Laxmans?
No because consistency matter and because Inzi was just having a higher output to set up wins in general. Laxman didn't average 50 plus in any country away from home.Wouldn’t you pick the bigger match winner?
VVS was terrific against Aus so sure it's a point in his favor, but overall he didn't average over 50 against them and averaged 44 in Aus, so between his big knocks he wasn't setting the world on fire.I picked VVS, he did well in Aud, against Australia.
However Inzy has the address advantage of being a superior odi batsman.
Played some great odi innings.
Inzy was a match builder.
what wins against teams that matterNo because consistency matter and because Inzi was just having a higher output to set up wins in general. Laxman didn't average 50 plus in any country away from home.
who cares?VVS was terrific against Aus so sure it's a point in his favor, but overall he didn't average over 50 against them and averaged 44 in Aus, so between his big knocks he wasn't setting the world on fire.
Against McGrath, Warne, Gillespie, leeVVS was terrific against Aus so sure it's a point in his favor, but overall he didn't average over 50 against them and averaged 44 in Aus, so between his big knocks he wasn't setting the world on fire.
184 in the 3rd test against India in 2005. Unbeaten 90 odd in SA to compare with Laxmans 96 there. Several tons against Murali. A triple ton against NZ. Several tons against Ambrose Walsh.what wins against teams that matter
Tbf I think Australia records is a big point in Laxman's favour mate. Doesn't need to average 50 v them for that to be the case.VVS was terrific against Aus so sure it's a point in his favor, but overall he didn't average over 50 against them and averaged 44 in Aus, so between his big knocks he wasn't setting the world on fire.
I know, I conceded that but just wanted to remind people that it's not like he was far beyond against Australia as many assume.Tbf I think Australia records is a big point in Laxman's favour mate. Doesn't need to average 50 v them for that to be the case.