capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
And Ponting as well.Comfortably the highest average in the 10K club. Should've been ahead of Kallis too.
And Ponting as well.Comfortably the highest average in the 10K club. Should've been ahead of Kallis too.
Miandad>Root>Kohli>Younis>WilliamsonIn next round of voting , my preference will be
Younis > Root > Kohli = Miandad > Williamson
You guessed right. Perhaps Pollock never played test cricket at his peak.Pollocks tests were unlikely at his peak. He only played 1 series after the age of 23/24, and he did seem to be improving with age/international experience.
Ya, I kinda think of 28-32 as the most typical absolute peak for bats, but it often extends either side of this. And the smaller the date range, the fewer the number of bats it will correspond to- form slumps happen even in what should be peak years.You guessed right. Perhaps Pollock never played test cricket at his peak.
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
45/50 names on that list averaged higher than their overall careers between 26 and 32
Sanga is very underrated on hereComfortably the highest average in the 10K club. Should've been ahead of Kallis too.
You rate Miandad over Younis?Barrington over Dravid and Miandad who put up similar numbers for as long against better bowlers would be a travesty. Williamson also.
I certainly do. Much tougher era for once.You rate Miandad over Younis?
No but that's a lost cause so I'm picking my battlesYou rate Miandad over Younis?
Why ?No but that's a lost cause so I'm picking my battles
I think one of the 3 Ws should be getting in soon too. Walcott?Why ?
I will support you .
This is my next 3 pick
Younis
Root
Kohli
Better than Graeme Smith , Hayden, Sehwag, Inzamam?I think one of the 3 Ws should be getting in soon too. Walcott?
yeah Root deserves a bump from where he was in 2022Why ?
I will support you .
This is my next 3 pick
Younis
Root
Kohli
The Ws? I believe so strongly.Better than Graeme Smith , Hayden, Sehwag, Inzamam?
Ok, where's the bias. From the same country, same era, same everything.Richards being mentioned… ugh. Why weren’t people voting for Procter as a bowler then? Almost double the sample size, same excellent peer rating but nope, not a single mention. Disgusting all round.
Not exactly bias, but doesn't really makes much sense either.Ok, where's the bias. From the same country, same era, same everything.