HouHsiaoHsien
International Debutant
Fair enoughNot taking anything away from Kohli’s century. Buttler’s proved to be a match winning one
Fair enoughNot taking anything away from Kohli’s century. Buttler’s proved to be a match winning one
The thing is if Kohli scores 50 of 25, RCB will collectively manage 160-170. Plus easier said than done vs the best attack of the season. Even Buttler and Samson took atleast 30 balls to reach their fifties, and they did it against the worst attack of the seasonKohli completed his 100 on his 69th ball.
Thats the slowest IPL hundred EVER.
Does he not know that T20 is no longer about run accumulation at 'good pace' but about getting as many as possible in as few deliveries as you can.. Its about net impact. Creating a big differential between runs scored and balls faced in shortest amount of time.
Far far better to get 50 off 25 then it is to score 100 off 69
This is ignoring context at its finestKohli playing for records is a perenneal curse for the RCB. He is a match loser.
And further it is Sawai Mansingh not Wankhede, and there were somewhat better batting conditions in the 2nd half.The thing is if Kohli scores 50 of 25, RCB will collectively manage 160-170. Plus easier said than done vs the best attack of the season. Even Buttler and Samson took atleast 30 balls to reach their fifties, and they did it against the worst attack of the season
I mean he was showing intent but it is tough to attack the best spin combo of the season in Sawai Mansingh in the first inningsNo one is blaming Kohli alone, rest of the players are garbage anyway but the sole good player has been playing this way since forever and is barely moving on from an outdated method, especially when batting 1st. This same method of batting has been India's downfall at each of the last few T20 World Cups. The T20 world has moved on from anchoring. Look at KKR. You have to start explosively.
He was like 37 off 32 balls while Faf was going a little quicker but their runrate was still like 8.5 rpo depite losing NO wickets after 13 overs.
In this period of T20 cricket and as an opener being 37 off 32 is unacceptable no matter who is bowling. He wasted 10 too many balls to get his initial 37 runs. Those 10 balls would have usually translated to another 15-20 runs later on. (plus the way he slowed down for his milestone in the 2nd last over). RCB should have scored 200 bare minimum. But it didn't happen thanks to **** lineup mainly and him still being stuck in 2012-16 mold of T20 batting.
I am not denying he could have tried more but its also hard to blame him when the other batsmen were and have been so ****. Maybe he is still batting in 2016 mold or maybe he is batting like that coz he knows the rest are so ****, either in form or ability. Either way, to me they had a slightly above par score for the pitch and conditions. Their bowlers and the way they are led are more to be blamed than the one guy who is actually holding the batting together.No one is blaming Kohli alone, rest of the players are garbage anyway but the sole good player has been playing this way since forever and is barely moving on from an outdated method, especially when batting 1st. This same method of batting has been India's downfall at each of the last few T20 World Cups. The T20 world has moved on from anchoring. Look at KKR. You have to start explosively.
He was like 37 off 32 balls while Faf was going a little quicker but their runrate was still like 8.5 rpo depite losing NO wickets for 13 overs.
In this period of T20 cricket and as an opener being 37 off 32 is unacceptable no matter who is bowling. He wasted 10 too many balls to get his initial 37 runs. Those 10 balls would have usually translated to another 15-20 runs later on. (plus the way he slowed down for his milestone in the 2nd last over). RCB should have scored 200 bare minimum. But it didn't happen thanks to **** lineup mainly and him still being stuck in 2012-16 mold of T20 batting.