What?My main crib is because he chose a convenient time to close the poll after two posters voted for Verity and then he himself edited his post just today to Verity. Can't get more obvious than that. That L&L doesn't favor Ashwin has been apparent in many of his posts but he should not have been going to such an extent to not get him into the rankings.
Are you trying to get to 10k posts or something with what? posts. Post something more.What?
Tampered? Come on I expected better from you than this whinging.Because the mod tampered his vote to get a SENA player ahead of a SC player.
Everyone has their own opinion but it should have been left at that. That would have been a fair poll. Not going back and editing votes just to not get him in.The poll's been closing around this time every day hasn't it?
And as to the substance of this, I'm sorry but f you think Ashwin's in the top 20 bowlers of all time then you've got your head up your arse.
I don't expect better from you at all any time because you are what you are. But I did expect better from L&L. I do respect him playing a lot of drafts with him together but the tampering was disappointing.Tampered? Come on I expected better from you than this whinging.
No. He counted the votes and then edited his post to Verity to get him ahead of Ashwin. I know he is honest. So, if L&L denies this contention, I'll move on.And what close of poll? Did @Line and Length delete a result or something?
If you respect him then post in the debate thread rather than ruining this one, which was going fine until you derailed it because you can't handle the results.I don't expect better from you at all any time because you are what you are. But I did expect better from L&L. I do respect him playing a lot of drafts with him together but the tampering was disappointing.
Hypothetically if he did that, it still doesn't violate any rules as far as I can tell. You're allowed to change. Now let us proceed with the rest of the voting.No. He counted the votes and then edited his post to Verity to get him ahead of Ashwin. I know he is honest. So, if L&L denies this contention, I'll move on.
It is not the results which I can't handle, but like Burgey has mentioned above, it's the rigging.If you respect him then post in the debate thread rather than ruining this one, which was going fine until you derailed it because you can't handle the results.
Hypothetically if he did that, it still doesn't violate any rules as far as I can tell.
I think he had Verity in his post when I read it about 18 hours ago so...No. He counted the votes and then edited his post to Verity to get him ahead of Ashwin. I know he is honest. So, if L&L denies this contention, I'll move on.
@Burgey are you going to tell him?It is not the results which I can't handle, but like Burgey has mentioned above, it's the rigging.
I thought you were ok.It is not the results which I can't handle, but like Burgey has mentioned above, it's the rigging.
I usually chug along here, but can't keep quiet when I see an apparent wrong-doing.I thought you were ok.
In a democracy sometimes you can vote against a candidate rather than for one. I don't see the point having sour grapes now when 20 players have already been selected. Could have complained in the beginning.Because whoever goes and edits later/ whoever votes late or last can alter the whole result because they can count and see who needs what
in an ideal voting process we wouldn't be aware of who others are voting for so that we are not being influenced and also so that we can't alter the result with 1-2 vote changes.