Ishant is better than FlintoffPeople thinking Lyon is a better bowler than Flintoff is wild
All Lyon has is longevity. It would be like thinking Jimmy Anderson is better than Ryan Harris or Shane Bond
Ishant averages just 26 across 52 tests from 2014 till 2021. His initial years were terrible. He is a poor man's Anderson.Ishant is better than Flintoff
Flintoff had an incredible peak though, even if it was short-lived. And if we're allowing ball tampering in the analysis then he's a real contenderIshant is better than Flintoff
Anderson better than both combined.It would be like thinking Jimmy Anderson is better than Ryan Harris or Shane Bond
What would Shane Harris do?Anderson better than both combined.
Ryan Bond would disintegrate the moment he picked up a cricket ball imo.
Shane Watson and Chris Harris combined? Will be the dream player of Honestbharani.....What would Shane Harris do?
I wouldn't go that far.Peak Flintoff was as good as any tier 1 bowler in full flow.
With Murray Mints he was closeI wouldn't go that far.
Has an excellent record in 'neutral' conditions.Yasir Shah could be an outside bet. He took 5-fers for fun. Qadir was also highly rated.
The GOAT of the desertHas an excellent record in 'neutral' conditions.
Ted McDonald>Jack GregoryActually have looked thru the options and it has to be Jack Gregory. Close thread
I get what you want to say but for that to happen Jadeja needs to average around 37-40 for next 4-5 years . And considering the competition in spin department he faces , he will be dropped if he averages 35-37 for 2 consecutive calendar years .This is just a transparent attempt to engineer a thread where the answer is not Jadeja. All I can say is wait til the end of his career and see what he averages then.