I fully agree. There have been the occasional votes that have raised my eyebrow but I've refrained from commenting. Everyone is entitled to their vote and opinion and members shouldn't try to influence others by posting comments.No slight, but kinda enjoyed the just voting, no punditry nature of this thread.
Noted.I fully agree. There have been the occasional votes that have raised my eyebrow but I've refrained from commenting. Everyone is entitled to their vote and opinion and members shouldn't try to influence others by posting comments.
This is such a passive aggressive post against @subshakerzNo slight, but kinda enjoyed the just voting, no punditry nature of this thread.
Don't tempt me.
Honestly wasn't. It's been clear of opinions, and I've also wanted to jump in ask questions, but I've refrained.
Apparently not.Don't tempt me.
The entire point of this format is to rank Barnes.If we are going to rate Barnes, he should be number 1 or in his own category. There is no grounds to put him in between.
My bad. Didn't realize that.Two of these already voted into the Top Three. We are deciding 4-6.
I am just pointing out the difficulty in ranking an oddity bowler like him.The entire point of this format is to rank Barnes.
We completed 4-6 and Murali has been selected.My bad. Didn't realize that.
Murali
Ambrose
Barnes