Line and Length
Cricketer Of The Year
Two of these already voted into the Top Three. We are deciding 4-6.Marshall
McGrath
Murali
Two of these already voted into the Top Three. We are deciding 4-6.Marshall
McGrath
Murali
Marshall
McGrath
Hadlee
But bonus points for getting the names and order rightAll already chosen I’m afraid.
Tests | Wickets | Average | S.R. | E.R. | WPM | ||
1 | M.Marshall | 81 | 376 | 20.95 | 46.77 | 2.69 | 4.64 |
2 | G.McGrath | 124 | 563 | 21.64 | 51.95 | 2.50 | 4.54 |
3 | R.Hadlee | 86 | 431 | 22.30 | 50.85 | 2.63 | 5.01 |
4 | M.Muralitharan | 133 | 800 | 22.73 | 55.05 | 2.48 | 6.02 |
5 | S. Warne | 145 | 708 | 25.42 | 57.49 | 2.65 | 4.89 |
6 | D. Steyn | 93 | 439 | 22.95 | 42.39 | 3.25 | 4.72 |
If we are going to rate Barnes, he should be number 1 or in his own category. There is no grounds to put him in between.Marshall
McGrath
Barnes
His numbers are great but only look obscene because of heavy minnow bashing on matting wickets.If we are going to rate Barnes, he should be number 1 or in his own category. There is no grounds to put him in between.
No slight, but kinda enjoyed the just voting, no punditry nature of this thread.If we are going to rate Barnes, he should be number 1 or in his own category. There is no grounds to put him in between.