• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Richards, Smith, Lara, Hammond

Who's No. 5


  • Total voters
    50

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Gavaskar, Viswanath, Amarnath also scored decent runs against better bowlers, and Lloyd and Kalicharan weren't shabby at all. No one from Australia averaged 30+ from Australia except Smith. Imo, the pitches just aren't comparable
They all scored about 170 less runs atleast than Viv, and WI didn’t have many good spinners. The next best WI bat scored nearly half of Viv. I agree Smith faced worse pitches, that’s why his series is better. But not by a hundred miles
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
By 1987, Imran was at his last leg as a bowler and way past his prime, same for Qadir and Wasim wasn't that good yet. I never said Viv played particularly worse bowling, just that Smith also haven't necessarily done so.
No. His prime lasted until 1988. In fact, his series against WI was his last great one. He took 23 wickets in 3 tests.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
You must be joking. First, did Archer play with Anderson? Second, Lillee and Thomo on mid 70s Aus pitches? Imran, Qadir and Qasim at home?
Lillee and Thommo in 76, Viv wasn't really that successful; Smith faced similar quality attack with Rabada, Steyn and Philander in 2018. In the series he was successful, I would say English attack in England comes close to that, though not better. Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami and Umesh in India is better than Imran and co in Pakistan.
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Lillee and Thommo in 76, Viv wasn't really that successful; Smith faced similar quality attack with Rabada, Steyn and Philander in 2018. In the series he was successful, I would say English attack in England comes close to that, though not better. Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami and Umesh in India is better than Imran and co in Pakistan.
Shami didn’t play in the 17 series. Plus Lillee, Thomson and Hogg(who was embarrassing Geoffery Boycott) in the 70s Aus pitches is atleast on the same level as the 17 series
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Also Imran(especially in his peak)Qadir and Qasim(brilliant record at home) is atleast as good as Broad and Anderson(who sucks in home Ashes anyways) in Eng
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Lillee and Thommo in 76, Viv wasn't really that successful; Smith faced similar quality attack with Rabada, Steyn and Philander in 2018. In the series he was successful, I would say English attack in England comes close to that, though not better. Ashwin, Jadeja, Shami and Umesh in India is better than Imran and co in Pakistan.
He failed against SA in 2018. You mean 2013.

Englands 2010 attack is not to that level sorry. I would take Willis, peak Botham and Hendrick over that.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Shami didn’t play in the 17 series. Plus Lillee, Thomson and Hogg(who was embarrassing Geoffery Boycott) in the 70s Aus pitches is atleast on the same level as the 17 series
And that's exactly what I said. All the cases, more or less comparable. On comparable levels, not totally something out of Smith's imagination....
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
He failed against SA in 2018. You mean 2013.

Englands 2010 attack is not to that level sorry. I would take Willis, peak Botham and Hendrick over that.
I would definitely not..... But that's Ok
Hou agreed that Smith did face it, we just disagree on the extent.
Yeah, I think so. I think Smith probably faced more challenging batting conditions (line-up+pitch); you think that's a laughable thought and Viv's level of attacks are leagues above Smith's most..... Let's agree to disagree then!
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
He was talking about 2015 series, where Anderson and Broad were bowling togther
And 2019 also. Even in the absence of Anderson, Broad and Archer were at peak and looking Very dangerous. Though definitely on paper Botham, Willis and Hendricks is a much better attack.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I would definitely not..... But that's Ok

Yeah, I think so. I think Smith probably faced more challenging batting conditions (line-up+pitch); you think that's a laughable thought and Viv's level of attacks are leagues above Smith's most..... Let's agree to disagree then!
Given his home career, yeah we definitely are going to have to disagree here.
 

Top