PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Do you think they would have won without using the Murray Mints?
Last edited:
Yea not a fan of what they did to McGrathOf course they wouldn't have. It would have been 5-0 Australia.
Add the Murray Mints fiasco to the deliberate placement of a cricket ball with the intention to cause maximum harm to Glenn MacGrath's ankle, and you've probably got good cause to ask for an extended period of jail time for all members of the team and management. Although, given the UK's reticence to jail miscreant cricketers, particularly allrounders, they'd probably just get a slap on the wrist. Joe Root would reverse paddle sweep the slap to 2nd slip.
Not to mention the sub-fielding fiasco, which England still cheat with to this day, and the blatantly one-sided poor umpiring (Martyn was sawn off lbw 3 times after hitting the ball IIRC)Of course they wouldn't have. It would have been 5-0 Australia.
Add the Murray Mints fiasco to the deliberate placement of a cricket ball with the intention to cause maximum harm to Glenn MacGrath's ankle, and you've probably got good cause to ask for an extended period of jail time for all members of the team and management. Although, given the UK's reticence to jail miscreant cricketers, particularly allrounders, they'd probably just get a slap on the wrist. Joe Root would reverse paddle sweep the slap to 2nd slip.
The running on and off the field to have showers after spells. Cook running off to get captaincy tips from the coach.Not to mention the sub-fielding fiasco, which England still cheat with to this day, and the blatantly one-sided poor umpiring (Martyn was sawn off lbw 3 times after hitting the ball IIRC)
the 90s?The running on and off the field to have showers after spells. Cook running off to get captaincy tips from the coach.
The real question should be has there ever been a period where England haven't been cheating?
The 1390s?the 90s?
We'll have to ask the FrenchThe 1390s?
Atherton had his dirt in pocket ball tampering scandal in the 90s (arguably worse than sandpaper gate)the 90s?
Did the production of Murray mints cease during that time frame? Are they a banned import product to Australia......or maybe just maybe there might be another significant difference between those 2 series you complete and utter buffoon.Bowling averages in the 2005 ashes with Murray Mints
Hoggard: 29.56
Harmison: 32.29
Flintoff: 27.29
Jones: 21.00
Bowling averages in the 06/07 ashes without Murray Mints:
Hoggard: 37.38
Harmison: 61.40
Flintoff: 43.73
Anderson: 82.60
Here they come wading into the debate with their illogical defence of 'Big Candy'.Did the production of Murray mints cease during that time frame? Are they a banned import product to Australia......or maybe just maybe there might be another significant difference between those 2 series you complete and utter buffoon.
What about taking a second new ball after 40 oversNot to mention the sub-fielding fiasco, which England still cheat with to this day, and the blatantly one-sided poor umpiring (Martyn was sawn off lbw 3 times after hitting the ball IIRC)