*Official* England in India 2023/24 #CryMoreTour

[Nintendo]

Ahh, hartley got a double ton a few years ago in the second XI's back in england. Thanks KP.

 

[GIMH]

Tom Hartley walks on water, but did KP really just give us a chance because he got a 2nd XI double

 

[Gnske]

No, it’s not good umpiring. They made the decision then Rohit had a whinge so they had another look. It’s ****ing appalling

This. They did it to avoid yet another Indian captain yelling into the stump mic about cheating.

The ICC is merely the export division of the BCCI.

 

[GIMH]

Ahh, hartley got a double ton a few years ago in the second XI's back in england. Thanks KP.

Genuinely chuckling away here. Amazing

 

[honestbharani]

Genuinely baffled as to why it went back up?

If Hartley had been given out in the end I’d have posted a few words in capital letters to express my outrage

But isn't umpire's call supposed to be out in this case? Or did they change the rule around it?

 

[honestbharani]

No, it’s not good umpiring. They made the decision then Rohit had a whinge so they had another look. It’s ****ing appalling

Nah.. this is how you guys got a wicket back in the 2021 tour in Chennai. Rahane, I think. Root had a whinge then too. Anyways, it was silly coz I think unless the umpire literally told the 3rd ump that his call for the LBW was not out, that was out.

 

[Gnske]

But isn't umpire's call supposed to be out in this case? Or did they change the rule around it?

It's happened a few times before. Depends on how the umpire has given you out, then it's only umpires call in the fielding side's favour for the original method of dismissal. If LBW hasn't been given, it resets to not-out umpires call.

It's been around awhile. I can't name the particular incident, but I remember this kind of thing blowing up a few years back.

 

[flibbertyjibber]

Ahh, hartley got a double ton a few years ago in the second XI's back in england. Thanks KP.

He'll mention his triple against Leicestershire and not getting a chance again soon.

 

[Aidan11]

Ah shoot.

 

[GIMH]

But isn't umpire's call supposed to be out in this case? Or did they change the rule around it?

I think once upon a time it would have been yeah. But because it wasn’t originally lbw I get the logic. I don’t really think there’s a satisfactory way to resolve on umpire’s call in that situation if am honest.

I don’t have a problem with them being confused by it, but the decision going back up for another look was poor.

And that really is the game. Well played Bumrah.

 

[Nintendo]

Foakes, you've ruined my erection. Good going, asshole.

 

[Socerer 01]

thats it then

 

[Socerer 01]

Foakes, you've ruined my erection. Good going, asshole.

For Foakes Sake

 

[GIMH]

Saving Jimmy for the winning runs I see

 

[Gnske]

This is all Root, Pope and Stokes's fault btw.

Especially Root and Stokes. A big chase is a big chase, but their dismissals were perfectly pathetic for the England cap. I guess McCullum's habit of losing and to keep losing has infested this team.

 

[reyrey]

No, it’s not good umpiring. They made the decision then Rohit had a whinge so they had another look. It’s ****ing appalling

Rohit was whinging about the original decision being out, but the lbw being not out on umpires call.

 

[MW1304]

That was inevitable. Should clean up the bunnies and pick up 10 here, would only be right.

 

[honestbharani]

It's happened a few times before. Depends on how the umpire has given you out, then it's only umpires call in the fielding side's favour for the original method of dismissal. If LBW hasn't been given, it resets to not-out umpires call.

It's been around awhile. I can't name the particular incident, but I remember this kind of thing blowing up a few years back.

Ah, yes, now I remember. I think they default to a not out call if they gave it as a catch. Fair enough.

 

[Socerer 01]

Rohit really wants Mukesh to get a wicket lol

 

[wpdavid]

This series hasn't been good news for Jack Leach. I can definitely see Tom Hartley rocking up at number eight in the Summer as the sole spinner.

Yes, that's one possible sub-plot from this series. The other one is whether Bairstow retains his place when Brook returns.