• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is the worst player of all time that would be selected in every XI in history?

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Who do you think was better?
It varies, as batsmen I rate Martyn higher but I saw him at his best but only caught the end of Waugh's career. Waugh's fielding (and bowling I guess) pushes him up though. When they played together 2000-2002 Martyn was definitely a better bat

Anyway I think we've found the answer to the thread. Whether it's Waugh, Martyn, de Silva or whever it's probably a middle-order bat around that standard
 
Last edited:

ataraxia

International Coach
I think it's someone who's worse than M Waugh / Martyn but better than Mead as a middle-order bat, while being marginally better than Langer as an opener.

Katich might be a genuinely good shout on that front, while Cowdrey's possibly a little too good.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think you're overthinking it. Katich wasn't really a better opener than Langer. Langer also averaged ~50 as opener from when he came back into the team in 2001 until his retirement.

Katich wasn't a better opener than middle-order bat either, his stint opening just coincided with him getting an extended run in the team. Still could be a good shout just based on being a similar level bat to Martyn/Waugh/de Silva etc.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
They went without Loxton in the first two tests, however, instead playing:

Barnes /
Morris /
Bradman /
Hassett /
Miller o /
Brown /
Johnson o /
Tallon + /
Lindwall o /
Johnston o
Toshack o

In which case Stokes still makes it for Toshack, or even Johnson or Brown.
Toshack perhaps, but not Johnson and definitely not Bill Brown. Don't forget Harvey wasn't picked in the early tests and McCool was injured and didn't play any of the tests.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Thing with Tallon is that despite underperforming with the bat at Test level he was a fantastic keeper. He makes a number of pre-Gilchrist Australian ATG XI’s, for example. And with Miller and Lindwall his mediocre batting can be masked. No great spinner a bigger flaw really.
Still had Johnson's offies and Johnston bowled SLAs as well as seamers. Had McCool not been injured they would've had his leggies.

Anyway, wasn't there a new ball every 60 or so overs? No need for a gun spinner.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Andrew Symonds?

Like Mark Waugh an aggressive middle order bat (ave 40) and handy spin or medium pace and great fielder but not as good as Mark Waugh?
Nah

Symonds wouldn't make an Indian team of 4-5 years ago. Probably wouldn't even make the current NZ team ahead of Glenn Phillips.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
I think it's someone who's worse than M Waugh / Martyn but better than Mead as a middle-order bat, while being marginally better than Langer as an opener.

Katich might be a genuinely good shout on that front, while Cowdrey's possibly a little too good.
As I said earlier the answer has to be Eddie Barlow
 

Flem274*

123/5
Shakib, Cairns and Stokes good shouts. Cairns is a better bowler than Lee plus the batting, and Shakib + Stokes are both better overall than most #6s floating around 00s Aus.

Same logic for the great windies but all 3 bat 6 ahead of Dujon at 7.
 

Top