• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Height vs pace: which is more important for pace bowler success?

bagapath

International Captain
How fast was Holding on average? High 80's, low 90's?
from 1976 to '81, I would say he would have regularly bowled in the low 90s.
and from 1983 to '87, he would have gradually dropped down to high 80s.

can't think of more than 5/6 names of those who remained in the "fast" category even after dropping some pace due to age in the last stage of their career. Holding is one of them.
 

Jumno

First Class Debutant
Shoaib's pace can beat and find the batsman edge making the pace extra harder for batsman to counter.
 

reyrey

U19 Captain
There is an accurate 6foot tall pacer out there who can bowl 90+ MPH and because of his bowling action and long arms he has a release point comparable to a much taller bowler. Unfortunately he is always injured
 

Ali TT

International Vice-Captain
In baseball, hasn't it basically stalled about about the same speeds?
A lot of "performance gains" in baseball outside the standard fitness regimen. Although probably the same in cricket in the 90s-00s.

I don't think many fast bowlers average 90+ all the time, at least in test cricket, so we're pretty much in fantasy land if we're talking about averaging 95.
 

Jumno

First Class Debutant
A lot of "performance gains" in baseball outside the standard fitness regimen. Although probably the same in cricket in the 90s-00s.

I don't think many fast bowlers average 90+ all the time, at least in test cricket, so we're pretty much in fantasy land if we're talking about averaging 95.
Im confident I seen a video which Tait hit the mid 90s in one over.

Tait may be one of the quickest ever.
 

kyear2

International Coach
A lot of "performance gains" in baseball outside the standard fitness regimen. Although probably the same in cricket in the 90s-00s.

I don't think many fast bowlers average 90+ all the time, at least in test cricket, so we're pretty much in fantasy land if we're talking about averaging 95.
When I hear averaging 95, I think consistently hitting the mid 90's to start a spell.

Don't think anyone can consistently average that over any sustained period of time.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Assuming you had a pacer around 6'0 bowling accurately at 80 to 85mph, and you had the option of giving him either 7-8 inches extra in height or 10mph in average extra in pace, what would you you choose to give to make him more effective,assuming same level of accuracy?
Pace, easily, but only if it didn't make him less durable. Generally, bowling express is a surefire way to **** up your body.
 

Ali TT

International Vice-Captain
When I hear averaging 95, I think consistently hitting the mid 90's to start a spell.

Don't think anyone can consistently average that over any sustained period of time.
Wood's probably the quickest going at the moment and can average in the 90s for a spell but more like high-80s over a multi-spell innings.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
In baseball, hasn't it basically stalled about about the same speeds?
Baseball at about 5-6 mph faster. 100 mph bowlers do come around more reguarly, but Chapman was the highest reliably recorded one at 106.

The majority of reliable pitchers can top out in the 90s.
 

Top