Yeah we already do this in cricket. No one thinks RtD was the GOAT ODI batsman, or that Voges > Sachin. And everyone knows that Sri Lankan cricketers stats from 1992 to 2010 don't count and need to be adjusted because they played mostly against minnows and on doctored home pitches that favoured their batsmen but also their spin bowlers for some reasonGrant all nations test status.
It isn't sacred, and the stats dilution argument is for dweebs. When talking rugby union no one looks at the top try scorers and goes BUT THEY SCORED 5 AGAINST CANADA AND HE SCORED 3 AGAINST NAMIBIA SO INVALID they just look at performances in context.
One advantage I can immediately think of is it would open the door to get regular game time if you didn't have to fly halfway across the world for most games, and it would provide more opportunities for both local associate players and foreign ring ins to get some paid hours on the field. The Dutch could play a test against the poms, a series in Ireland etc and it would be a cheaper entry into test cricket than if they were granted test status tomorrow and marched off to Bangladesh or wherever.
I wont even say it has to change much. Back in the original Pig 3 version, they spoke of something called a test match fund or corpus they were gonna create to help pay teams to play tests alone. If they do that properly, even that should suffice. I understand the issues with basically giving out handouts given how corrupt almost all cricket boards are, including CWI. But surely they can figure out a way to pay for the test teams alone where its not sustainable.I think this is required reading - India, Australia and England boards should do more for Test cricket - Johnny Grave
Bottom line is the revenue model needs to change or these ideas are all pointless.
Show it by supporting PEWS first.Willing to even do a concept drawing. Many of you will know I've been supporting the idea of dehumanising cricket for years.
Why would any decent overseas players want to play in the First Class competition of a "smaller team" though? Only reason it works in County Cricket is there is decent money involved. Can't imagine Zimbabwe domestic cricket being able to entice many genuinely good overseas playersFirst Class cricket must not have any limits on the amount of foreign players they can use in an XI , that way smaller teams can have players playing in better systems around the world and be better players.
Funny you say that as a few Poms do play Zimbabwe domestix; it's the only FC competition that does attract overseas players apart from the CC, I think.Why would any decent overseas players want to play in the First Class competition of a "smaller team" though? Only reason it works in County Cricket is there is decent money involved. Can't imagine Zimbabwe domestic cricket being able to entice many genuinely good overseas players
oh that was a typo I meant "any other domestic comp except Zimbabwe"Funny you say that as a few Poms do play Zimbabwe domestix; it's the only FC competition that does attract overseas players apart from the CC, I think.
GOAT ODI allrounder imoYeah we already do this in cricket. No one thinks RtD was the GOAT ODI batsman, or that Voges > Sachin. And everyone knows that Sri Lankan cricketers stats from 1992 to 2010 don't count and need to be adjusted because they played mostly against minnows and on doctored home pitches that favoured their batsmen but also their spin bowlers for some reason