Coronis
International Coach
Nobody said he isn’t an ATG player. We just don’t think he’s an ATG batsman.Can’t believe some tards don’t think Gilchrist is an atg
Nobody said he isn’t an ATG player. We just don’t think he’s an ATG batsman.Can’t believe some tards don’t think Gilchrist is an atg
Averaged 47 at a SR of 82. He absolutely was.Nobody said he isn’t an ATG player. We just don’t think he’s an ATG batsman.
He absolutely wasn’t, and you know it. Nobody’s downplaying him or what he accomplished, in fact I doubt you’d find a single person here who isn’t a fan of Gilly, but for some reason you can’t accept a simple truth.Averaged 47 at a SR of 82. He absolutely was.
@thierry henryHe absolutely wasn’t, and you know it. Nobody’s downplaying him or what he accomplished, in fact I doubt you’d find a single person here who isn’t a fan of Gilly, but for some reason you can’t accept a simple truth.
Unless you have some ridiculously low bar for ATG bats (are there more than 50 in your mind?), but hey, thats your right.
Comfortably underrating Walcott at the very least.Gilly will be a top 40 batsman in test cricket history. And that is ATG level for sure.
Way above him:
Bradman/ Hobbs/ Hutton/ Hammond/ Sobers/ Richards/ Tendulkar/ Lara/ G Chappell/ Gavaskar
Comfortably above him:
S Smith/ Ponting/Dravid/ Kallis/ Sangakara/Miandad/ Weekes/ Border/ S Waugh/ Younis/ G Pollock/ Headley
Marginally above him:
Williamson/ Inzy/ Root/ Kohli/ Harvey/
In his league:
Mahela/ Clarke/ Hayden/ Chanderpaul/ Compton/Sehwag/ G Smith/ A Flower / ABDV/ Walcott/ Worrell/ Greenidge/ Crowe/ Laxman
How do I “know it”?He absolutely wasn’t, and you know it. Nobody’s downplaying him or what he accomplished, in fact I doubt you’d find a single person here who isn’t a fan of Gilly, but for some reason you can’t accept a simple truth.
Unless you have some ridiculously low bar for ATG bats (are there more than 50 in your mind?), but hey, thats your right.
Sad that on a thread entitled "Is Ben Stokes an ATG Test Cricketer" that you feel the need to highlight the name Stokes when responding.He (Stokes) probably is to a lot of England fans for mainly sentimental reasons, but I doubt many others elsewhere in the world feel the same.
Thread hasn't been invented/discovered in Australia yet.Sad that on a thread entitled "Is Ben Stokes an ATG Test Cricketer" that you feel the need to highlight the name Stokes when responding.
Why can't Gilly **** off and get his own thread?
A comparison or discussion thread isn’t truly great until its completely derailed at some point.Sad that on a thread entitled "Is Ben Stokes an ATG Test Cricketer" that you feel the need to highlight the name Stokes when responding.
Why can't Gilly **** off and get his own thread?
Because SR isn’t the be all and end all, he had only an 8 year career in the easiest batting era of all time and record still doesn’t compare favourably with actual ATGs from worse batting eras, nor others from his own era who had longer careers and in worse batting conditions. Anyway I agree, too off topic, won’t be making further posts on him in this thread.How do I “know it”?
there’s no “simple truth” I can’t accept. He was a guy averaging almost fifty with a SR of 82. Of all the elite bats, ever, only Sehwag is in that sort of SR territory.
Surely it doesn’t need to be explained here what the significance of that is
Dale Steyn on commentary has said he'd have Stokes in his team over Kallis and hinted that a lot of other retired international pros share similar opinions.He (Stokes) probably is to a lot of England fans for mainly sentimental reasons, but I doubt many others elsewhere in the world feel the same.
If true, further confirmation for my opinion the ex-pros often aren't actually the most knowledgeable about cricket.Dale Steyn on commentary has said he'd have Stokes in his team over Kallis and hinted that a lot of other retired international pros share similar opinions.