Spark
Global Moderator
At least we didn't ****ing win the toss and choose to bat first for 60aoSo couldn't even make it to 60.
At least they did better than 47, lol.
At least we didn't ****ing win the toss and choose to bat first for 60aoSo couldn't even make it to 60.
At least they did better than 47, lol.
to be fair if their top order isn't outstanding with supposed best XI it could be they stuck with tried and trusted and didn't try anyone new, might simply be the players coming in to disrespect Tests might put up a fight, after all they aren't like many setups of being 'in' with their bessies, would have to scored 750 runs in 50 innings to be dropped, so have a chance to make their case for retentionElgar and Bavuma aside, over the last four years the rest of the batting is much of muchness. There really aren't any stand out young guns or steely vets. Bedingham has the best pedigree from any batting debutant in ages for SA. The blokes on that NZ tour have loads to play for because every position is up for grabs in that top 7 bar Bavuma IMHO.
hmm what do you think of India’s tail?don't believe sense comes into cricket, sides play almost a set line up or 'balance' even though the 'balance' isn't
can be too much 'faith' in capabilities of middle and lower order batting, England at the World Cup might have had a line up if not Ali, Curran, Woakes, Rashid, Topley then similar in terms of all bar Topley can bat but in ODIs I wouldn't be expecting more than maybe 10-15 runs usual and 20-30 cameo sometimes max
Ali and Curran aren't such good, or even for me remotely good enough, bowlers that the 20-30 runs they might bring balances the bowling which could be 1 or 0 for 50-60 (Ali) or worse, and when batting even if say 240/4 or 5 you want support for any remaining batsman and partnerships which the 10-15 don't really bring, more regular wicket fall
that tail looks painfully long, Maharaj and Rabada can bat but saffers don't seem to have much depth these days, not that the 8-11 should be digging you out of holes when the top order are 34/5, that's a write off, but had it been say 160/5 then that's when a little more depth of batting helps a little - not at the expense of bowling, but how many bowlers are sooooooooooo good you can afford to not take batting into account or stick 3-4 in the side.....?
I thought he went to school there and would have qualified on residency? I know his brother was born in Cape Town.He wouldn't have qualified for SA though would he?
I knew he was born in Northampton, but Wiki 'confirms' he went to school in Harare. I don't think there's any means by which he'd have qualified for SA.I thought he went to school there and would have qualified on residency? I know his brother was born in Cape Town.
That's the bizarre thing here. The way this pitch has behaved, I'm not sure why anyone would have opted to bat first.At least we didn't ****ing win the toss and choose to bat first for 60ao
conditions might not change, but having seen what they did to the saffers (cause they did it) they may battle their way to a 1st innings lead trying not to lose too many wicketsI mean, if they're bowled out soon , the conditions will barely have had time to change for India's batting. So it might not matter much.
Well, I know that his dad Kevin was Zimbabwean so that makes sense, but I did not know if he grew up in Zim or SA. I had assumed that because his brother was born in SA, that he might have gone to school there.I knew he was born in Northampton, but Wiki 'confirms' he went to school in Harare. I don't think there's any means by which he'd have qualified for SA.