Well that was a truly awful session.
Pakistan seem to be experts at setting themselves up like this. They insist that their best bowler plays every international, then he gets a potentially debilitating knee injury. They rush him back for a tournament, he bowls poorly, and since then has been lacking in pace. Their other better bowler gets a shoulder injury, and they let him go play some two-bit T20 league anyway, and he misses the World Cup and this tour. Then they ignore options who might have been better and scrape together some detritus, and even then manage to make an illogical selection (Khurram looks okay as a line and length bowler, but Jamal has done nothing and Ashraf should not even be in the squad). To top it off their only experienced, if diminished, bowler bowls absolute crap and they keep up the usual fielding standard.
I'd like to win, but against teams that aren't England or India I'd like to also see some competitive cricket. Even as bad as the Pakistan squad was on paper they've managed to select one of the worse combinations (on the basis of what? That one tour match?) and then start off very badly. It's like they don't take it seriously, but what can you expect from a board run as unprofessionally? They don't take test cricket or first class cricket seriously.