• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* New Zealand in Bangladesh 2023/24

Skyliner

International 12th Man
Nicholls is just playing in the wrong era, poor guy. If he was playing with the blokes who had to face the Windies in their pomp with bats half the size of what they have now, and never got to play Zim-Bang, Nicholls would have been a stand-out performer(?)


‘New Black Caps selector Sam Wells believes part of the criticism over the inclusion and performances of Henry Nicholls in the test side stems from the era he is playing in.

“Henry is up there with some of our greats of the game in terms of run scoring,” Wells said.

“He seems to attract this criticism ... he's playing with some of the greats of the modern era for New Zealand, when you look at some of the other guy's averages.”

In 56 tests, Nicholls has accumulated 2970 runs at an average of 37.59, with nine centuries and 12 fifties.

“If you looked at past teams, and they had a batsman with Henry Nicholls’ record, he would be one of our best players – and it is a very good record.

”His form has been up and down a little bit, but obviously he scored a double-hundred a couple of tests ago. He's got nine test centuries, which is as many as Stephen Fleming scored in his 111 tests.”
 

The Hutt Rec

International Vice-Captain
It’s the weirdest selection justification I’ve ever heard. I mean Guptill would have been a great test opener in the days when we had Hartland and Pocock opening the innings, should we call him back?

I had high hopes Sam Wells would bring some new ideas to the selection table, but based on this he’ll be even more hopeless than Larsen.
 

Howsie

International Captain
It’s the weirdest selection justification I’ve ever heard. I mean Guptill would have been a great test opener in the days when we had Hartland and Pocock opening the innings, should we call him back?

I had high hopes Sam Wells would bring some new ideas to the selection table, but based on this he’ll be even more hopeless than Larsen.
We needed a full clean out, coach and selector. If we brought in a completely new, unbiased, free from personal attachments staff would Henry Nicholls be playing right now? Would Neil Wagner have even picked up a central contract. No they would’ve been moved on.

New Zealand is still a good team obviously, but the tough calls have to start coming and come real soon. I cringed last summer when Wagner said he admires James Anderson and wants to replicate what he’s done by making it to 40. Nobody in this set up has the balls to tap him on the shoulder and tell him it’s over.

Williamson after the World Cup was adamant this wasn’t the end for “this group” Well yeah, for a lot of them it should be (talking one day cricket here obviously) But who is going to move them on?

I’ve always thought after Stead dropped Southee for Henry in the 2020 Sydney test he was given the hard word from the senior players. Never seen him make a move like that since and just look at how quickly this team is aging because of it.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
It's a weird article. It's like he's retroactively justifying his entire career selection, rather than his recent form and obvious flaws.

"He's **** away from home and against quality opposition, but if you ignore all that his overall record is just as good as mediocre players 30 years ago"

I'm wondering if it's a PR "this guy is getting a lot of social media flack so we should say something" move to make it easier to drop if Nicholls doesn't perform against South Africa ahead of the Australia series. Given Nicholls penchant for scoring against SA at home and that they're sending a B team, it's a perfect storm for him to be selected #forever
 

Ghost75

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
It's a weird article. It's like he's retroactively justifying his entire career selection, rather than his recent form and obvious flaws.

"He's **** away from home and against quality opposition, but if you ignore all that his overall record is just as good as mediocre players 30 years ago"

I'm wondering if it's a PR "this guy is getting a lot of social media flack so we should say something" move to make it easier to drop if Nicholls doesn't perform against South Africa ahead of the Australia series. Given Nicholls penchant for scoring against SA at home and that they're sending a B team, it's a perfect storm for him to be selected #forever
Isn’t Nicholls brother the PR guy?
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
tbf Skyliner's improvement hasn't been massive; it's simply shown how little the difference is between "utterly dreadful turgid pessimism" and "mainstream thierry henry–esque doommongering" is.
Maybe NZ have just got worse so you disagree with him less.
 

Top