HouHsiaoHsien
International Debutant
Yep. Pollock is one of the great ODI bowlers and a decent lower order bat.I’ll admit I’m not an ODI guy so I have no idea, but was Pollock really a better AR than Kallis in that format?
Yep. Pollock is one of the great ODI bowlers and a decent lower order bat.I’ll admit I’m not an ODI guy so I have no idea, but was Pollock really a better AR than Kallis in that format?
Opening with Crowe feels so wrong lolPick Crowe as an opener and put Mitchell at 5.
I will have only 1 change . Replace Starc with Klusener. Klusener, Richards and Sachin to be combined 5th bowler .
Starc is the highest wicket taker of two back to back World Cups; even Player of the Tournament once. And while this World Cup wasn't particularly great for him, he was instrumental in the most important Aussie victories. So with a heavy heart, if you must have to remove a bowler for Klusner; it has to be Akram....I will have only 1 change . Replace Starc with Klusener. Klusener, Richards and Sachin to be combined 5th bowler .
Quit the faux hand wringing, and just honestly say you would gleefully exclude Wasim Akram.Starc is the highest wicket taker of two back to back World Cups; even Player of the Tournament once. And while this World Cup wasn't particularly great for him, he was instrumental in the most important Aussie victories. So with a heavy heart, if you must have to remove a bowler for Klusner; it has to be Akram....
Nope. I like Wasim Akram.Quit the faux hand wringing, and just honestly say you would gleefully exclude Wasim Akram.
4 number threes, including Sanga batting at 6(!!), followed by 5 tail enders. It's a list of highest run scorers and highest wicket takers with some very minor tweaks.
Leaving Gilchrist put is a travesty given his record in finals. Would also replace Warne with Hogg or Klusener.
Guess I didn't see those games. How did he do in the 96 final thoughDoesn't history also say that in 3 finals he played, he received 3 MOMs? Kind of flies in the face of your Gilchrist position.
yeah - I forgot the 96 final. So the piece of **** only MOM's in 3/4 WC finals. Not good enough.Guess I didn't see those games. How did he do in the 96 final though
I'm actually partial to Hogg myself. It is quite amazing that you can make a successful case for him over Warne.Look I'm not anti Warne so much as I'm pro Hogg, and pro-Klusener. Even Symonds maybe (as 5th bowler obviously)