Whilst India will rightly start as favourites, Australia are a very dangerous opponent.
They have 3 batsmen - Head, Maxwell and Marsh who can take any attack apart. They are well suppprted by Warner, Smith and Labuschagne.
Their lower order is a bit weak though but so too is India's.
The Aussie bowling is good but Cummings and Starc, as good as they are, can be expensive.
For India they have virtually everything covered - their only weakness is they do have a bit of a tail.
Their top 6 is very good and they're the best bowling attack in the competition with no real weak links.
I think India deserve to win and I think they will do but only a fool would write the Aussies off.
was looking at the figures of Cummins and Starc in the World Cup (both 36-37 averages) and in India vs India, probably won't leave Cumming out but ought to consider it
aussies had India 2/3 in their group game (that's 3 wickets for aussies who don't get the whole concept bowling figures are wickets/runs and totals are runs/wickets ie 400/5, problem is Cummins and Zampa did diddly
they are vulnerable with a lower order which can score cameos, bit better than England's supposed deep batting, but isn't all that great. if India don't make dents in their top order then should be ok
199 vs IND - were 74/1 but Jadeja took out Smith (46) and Labuschagne (27) and from 119/4 they added only 80 more runs, and despite said good start by their bowlers couldn't sustain it
177 vs SAF - put South Africans in as a few did and saw them pile on runs, 70/6 their start, Labuschagne 46 about the "highlight"
215/5 vs SRL - chasing, 52 from Marsh at the top and 30s-50s in the middle saw them home
367/9 vs PAK - 259 by the opening pair, all 10 wickets lost for 108 runs
399/8 vs HOL - couple of hundreds and fifties, early loss of Marsh at 28/1 not a problem
388 vs NZL - 175 opening stand, 1-8 all made double figures but barely half Warner's 81 at best outside 1-2
286 vs ENG - England had them 117/4 but allowed 6-11 (132) to score more than they should have and England fell short
293/7 vs AFG - 91/7 and never looked back, well Maxwell certainly won this one with 201no
307/2 vs BAN - Marsh 177no after they were 12/1
215/7 vs SAF (SF) - 60/0 to 61/2 and 133/4 to 137/5 losing two quick wickets twice aside they all but two got double figures and got home safely enough - well just about!
lost their opening two games, one against the unbeaten Indians "on their patch" with scores under 200, and next lowest is 286 outside of chases even if they may have made less than 286 against South Africa had the target been more than that
tough for aussies but I reckon they're the only team in the tournament could beat India, and would be funny if the only game the Indians lost was the final, might have been better to lose to Holland and left deshis go out of CT, but I guess could also win it with 11 wins out of 11
of course now kiwis and saffers are out guarantees no new name on the trophy