RossTaylorsBox
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No we didn't, maybe you did.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official***Match #35 - New Zealand vs Pakistan - November 4th - Bengaluru
- Thread starter ankitj
- Start date
King Kane
International Regular
Doesn't seem like there is much chance of them getting back out there.
We will be one of the few teams to lose an ODI after scoring over 400.
I can't think of many others, the only one I can think of is this one back in 2006 where Australia scored 434 and South Africa chased it down scoring 438.
www.espncricinfo.com
We will be one of the few teams to lose an ODI after scoring over 400.
I can't think of many others, the only one I can think of is this one back in 2006 where Australia scored 434 and South Africa chased it down scoring 438.
SA vs AUS, Australia tour of South Africa 2005/06, 5th ODI at Johannesburg, March 12, 2006 - Full Scorecard
Get cricket scorecard of 5th ODI, SA vs AUS, Australia tour of South Africa 2005/06 at New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg dated March 12, 2006.
www.espncricinfo.com
If it was against Netherlands I would have agreed with you, but SL? They are the worst
RossTaylorsBox
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Wow, never heard of that game before.
Adorable Asshole
International Regular
Athlai at the end of NZ innings told me I need a towel because Pak gonna lose.
So I replied him back. Since if match doesn't start NZ gonna lose so they need a drainage system to restart a match.
Yeah I know not a particularly funny joke.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
This would be a stupid but also funny way for this to end.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's been entirely ground dependant really. The Chennai and Lucknow games have been mid to low scoring. Wankhede and bengaluru have always been roads so not a surprised they've produced most of the runfests.
Dendarii
International Debutant
Unless there have been other rain shortened matches then that's the only one. The only other time a team batting second has scored more than 400 is Sri Lanka's 411 chasing 414 against India.Doesn't seem like there is much chance of them getting back out there.
We will be one of the few teams to lose an ODI after scoring over 400.
I can't think of many others, the only one I can think of is this one back in 2006 where Australia scored 434 and South Africa chased it down scoring 438.
SA vs AUS, Australia tour of South Africa 2005/06, 5th ODI at Johannesburg, March 12, 2006 - Full Scorecard
Get cricket scorecard of 5th ODI, SA vs AUS, Australia tour of South Africa 2005/06 at New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg dated March 12, 2006.
IND vs SL Cricket Scorecard, 1st ODI at Rajkot, December 15, 2009
Get cricket scorecard of 1st ODI, IND vs SL, Sri Lanka tour of India 2009/10 at Madhavrao Scindia Cricket Ground, Rajkot dated December 15, 2009.
www.espncricinfo.com
King Kane
International Regular
I watched Australia's innings when they scored 434 thinking they would have an easy win, couldn't believe it when I woke up and saw that SA had won.
Herschelle Gibbs went berserk with 175 and poor old Mick Lewis went down in infamy with the worst ever ODI bowling figures of 0/113 off 10 overs.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Haha he was being sarcastic, that's one of the most famous ODI games ever
HouHsiaoHsien
International Debutant
So this came off horribly wrong
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
****ing amen brother
Adorable Asshole
International Regular
4 losses on trot for NZ.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lol that's unfortunate
